Future gender in pediatric transgender and DSD/intersex consultations: a conversation analysis

No child's future gender identity can be predicted with certainty. This uncertainty can become a clinical challenge in both pediatric transgender care and differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex care, in which current predictions of a child's future gender may guide treatment decisions. Using conversation analysis, we examined video-recorded consultations in Dutch pediatric transgender and DSD/intersex care to examine how participants manage children's future gender in the here-and-now of their interactions. This article focuses on healthcare providers' sequence-initiating actions, ranging from rather unilateral to more bilateral approaches, specifically focusing on the two ends of the spectrum. We show examples of treatment assertions, where healthcare providers unilaterally relate potential treatment to a child's future gender, and bilateral perspective-display invitations, where the child's perspective on their future gender is explicitly incited. We show how treatment assertions leave little room for children to be interactionally involved, while perspective-display invitations elicit children to contribute to the local construction of their prospective gender, despite children's displayed uncertainty. Perspective-display invitations grant children epistemic authority regarding their future gender, whereas treatment assertions claim epistemic authority regarding gender-related treatment, although they do grant children deontic authority in terms of future treatment decisions. Also, treatment assertions are grounded in normative gender assumptions, but do render alternative futures possible by presenting treatment as optional. Perspective-display invitations may enable more open and collaborative challenging of gender norms. We argue that for clinical practice, particularly perspective-display invitations merit professional consideration as they facilitate children's participation and collaborative uncertainty management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119100
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future gender in pediatric transgender and DSD/intersex consultations: a conversation analysis

Anke Oerlemans, C.M. Verhaak, Mieke Breukelman, Wyke Stommel
Social Science & Medicine
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Future gender in pediatric transgender and DSD/intersex consultations: a conversation analysis

Anke Oerlemans, C.M. Verhaak, Mieke Breukelman, Wyke Stommel
article en

Abstract

No child's future gender identity can be predicted with certainty. This uncertainty can become a clinical challenge in both pediatric transgender care and differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex care, in which current predictions of a child's future gender may guide treatment decisions. Using conversation analysis, we examined video-recorded consultations in Dutch pediatric transgender and DSD/intersex care to examine how participants manage children's future gender in the here-and-now of their interactions. This article focuses on healthcare providers' sequence-initiating actions, ranging from rather unilateral to more bilateral approaches, specifically focusing on the two ends of the spectrum. We show examples of treatment assertions, where healthcare providers unilaterally relate potential treatment to a child's future gender, and bilateral perspective-display invitations, where the child's perspective on their future gender is explicitly incited. We show how treatment assertions leave little room for children to be interactionally involved, while perspective-display invitations elicit children to contribute to the local construction of their prospective gender, despite children's displayed uncertainty. Perspective-display invitations grant children epistemic authority regarding their future gender, whereas treatment assertions claim epistemic authority regarding gender-related treatment, although they do grant children deontic authority in terms of future treatment decisions. Also, treatment assertions are grounded in normative gender assumptions, but do render alternative futures possible by presenting treatment as optional. Perspective-display invitations may enable more open and collaborative challenging of gender norms. We argue that for clinical practice, particularly perspective-display invitations merit professional consideration as they facilitate children's participation and collaborative uncertainty management.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 396
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.