Longitudinal combined seismic mitigation systems and optimal control for long span triple-tower suspension bridges

Abstract Compared with the two-tower suspension bridge, the seismic response of the middle tower is crucial for the seismic design of triple-tower suspension bridges. A finite element model was developed for a suspension bridge. The seismic responses of a triple-tower suspension bridge with an elastic cable (EC) or a fluid viscous damper (FVD) installed between the tower and the deck were analyzed, and the application of an energy dissipation central buckle (EDCB) which was composed of multiple buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) installed at the mid-span in the triple-tower suspension bridge was discussed. Several novel seismic mitigation systems, such as the combination of EDCB and FVD, and the combination of EDCB and EC, were implemented to control the seismic responses of triple-tower suspension bridges. The effects of different seismic mitigation systems on the seismic responses of suspension bridges were studied. Additionally, the seismic performance of triple-tower suspension bridges was evaluated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, and the selection of parameters for seismic mitigation systems in suspension bridges was discussed. The results show that the longitudinal displacement (LD) of suspension bridges can be effectively controlled by using EC or FVD; however, the internal forces of the middle tower significantly increase due to the use of EC. Applying an energy dissipation central buckle (EDCB) is an effective measure to reduce the internal forces of the middle tower in triple-tower suspension bridges. The combination of EDCB and traditional seismic mitigation devices is highly beneficial for improving the seismic performance of triple-tower suspension bridges. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method can be used to select the optimal parameters for seismic mitigation systems. The results indicate that Case 23 is the optimal solution for controlling the seismic responses of the triple-tower suspension bridge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Bridge Engineering
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-025-00195-z
Primary Topic
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal combined seismic mitigation systems and optimal control for long span triple-tower suspension bridges

Long Lu, Guangwu Tang, Taishuai Huang
Advances in Bridge Engineering
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
article

Longitudinal combined seismic mitigation systems and optimal control for long span triple-tower suspension bridges

Long Lu, Guangwu Tang, Taishuai Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Compared with the two-tower suspension bridge, the seismic response of the middle tower is crucial for the seismic design of triple-tower suspension bridges. A finite element model was developed for a suspension bridge. The seismic responses of a triple-tower suspension bridge with an elastic cable (EC) or a fluid viscous damper (FVD) installed between the tower and the deck were analyzed, and the application of an energy dissipation central buckle (EDCB) which was composed of multiple buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) installed at the mid-span in the triple-tower suspension bridge was discussed. Several novel seismic mitigation systems, such as the combination of EDCB and FVD, and the combination of EDCB and EC, were implemented to control the seismic responses of triple-tower suspension bridges. The effects of different seismic mitigation systems on the seismic responses of suspension bridges were studied. Additionally, the seismic performance of triple-tower suspension bridges was evaluated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, and the selection of parameters for seismic mitigation systems in suspension bridges was discussed. The results show that the longitudinal displacement (LD) of suspension bridges can be effectively controlled by using EC or FVD; however, the internal forces of the middle tower significantly increase due to the use of EC. Applying an energy dissipation central buckle (EDCB) is an effective measure to reduce the internal forces of the middle tower in triple-tower suspension bridges. The combination of EDCB and traditional seismic mitigation devices is highly beneficial for improving the seismic performance of triple-tower suspension bridges. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method can be used to select the optimal parameters for seismic mitigation systems. The results indicate that Case 23 is the optimal solution for controlling the seismic responses of the triple-tower suspension bridge.

Advances in Bridge EngineeringVol. 7(1)
Chongqing University (CN), Chengdu University of Technology (CN), Merchants Chongqing Communications Research and Design Institute (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.