Impact of the preparatory school’s final English proficiency exam on students’ productive skills

This qualitative case study investigated the impact of a university preparatory school’s final English proficiency exam on students’ productive skills (speaking and writing) and on their emotions and opinions about learning English. 40 students and 7 instructors from a foundation university in Türkiye participated in the study. Data were collected through students’ written and spoken tasks, open-ended surveys, and instructors’ assessment notes, and analyzed using content analysis. Findings indicate that the overall exam had more varied impacts on students than each of the specific tests for speaking and writing. The impact of the exam on students’ emotions and opinions ranged from positive to negative. Among the productive skills, speaking elicited more negative emotional reactions than writing. While both speaking and writing skills were positively impacted by the exam, the effect was stronger on speaking skills, especially for students with higher proficiency levels. In contrast, no clear relationship was found between proficiency levels and the impact on writing skill. In that, higher proficiency did not correlate with greater improvement. These results suggest that the broader the exam content, the more complex its influence on learners is. The findings have implications for educators and test developers, emphasizing the importance of designing low-stakes exams that encourage positive outcomes and reduce anxiety, especially in the assessment of productive skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1680328
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the preparatory school’s final English proficiency exam on students’ productive skills

Cemal Çakır, Rukiye Elifnur Özmen
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Impact of the preparatory school’s final English proficiency exam on students’ productive skills

Cemal Çakır, Rukiye Elifnur Özmen
article en

Abstract

This qualitative case study investigated the impact of a university preparatory school’s final English proficiency exam on students’ productive skills (speaking and writing) and on their emotions and opinions about learning English. 40 students and 7 instructors from a foundation university in Türkiye participated in the study. Data were collected through students’ written and spoken tasks, open-ended surveys, and instructors’ assessment notes, and analyzed using content analysis. Findings indicate that the overall exam had more varied impacts on students than each of the specific tests for speaking and writing. The impact of the exam on students’ emotions and opinions ranged from positive to negative. Among the productive skills, speaking elicited more negative emotional reactions than writing. While both speaking and writing skills were positively impacted by the exam, the effect was stronger on speaking skills, especially for students with higher proficiency levels. In contrast, no clear relationship was found between proficiency levels and the impact on writing skill. In that, higher proficiency did not correlate with greater improvement. These results suggest that the broader the exam content, the more complex its influence on learners is. The findings have implications for educators and test developers, emphasizing the importance of designing low-stakes exams that encourage positive outcomes and reduce anxiety, especially in the assessment of productive skills.

International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education(Advanced Online Publication)
Ankara Sosyal Bilimler Üniversitesi (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.