From Innovation to Inclusion? The Human Rights Dilemma of Digital Citizenship

The development of digital identity systems, driven by biometric technologies, blockchain, and artificial intelligence, has been presented as a tool for security, innovation, and efficiency in public and private services. Yet, their rapid implementation raises critical concerns regarding privacy, data protection, and non-discrimination. The centralization of sensitive data and the interconnection of state and corporate databases create risks of expanded surveillance and exclusion of vulnerable groups. This paper examines the construction of digital citizenship in the European Union, with particular attention to the European Digital Identity Wallet, reflecting on its implications for social justice and democratic participation. The study is grounded in a legal and philosophical framework, integrating insights from human rights law, critical technology studies, and social studies of innovation. It argues that, while digital citizenship is conceived as a vector of inclusion, it risks becoming a mechanism of inequality and control if robust safeguards are not implemented. The analysis underscores the need for public policies that guarantee transparency, proportionality, and independent oversight. It further suggests that digital citizenship should not be reduced to a technological instrument but reimagined as a space for emancipation and democratic participation, where human dignity remains the guiding principle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202622901001/pdf
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Innovation to Inclusion? The Human Rights Dilemma of Digital Citizenship

Sílvia de Carvalho Homem
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

From Innovation to Inclusion? The Human Rights Dilemma of Digital Citizenship

Sílvia de Carvalho Homem
article en

Abstract

The development of digital identity systems, driven by biometric technologies, blockchain, and artificial intelligence, has been presented as a tool for security, innovation, and efficiency in public and private services. Yet, their rapid implementation raises critical concerns regarding privacy, data protection, and non-discrimination. The centralization of sensitive data and the interconnection of state and corporate databases create risks of expanded surveillance and exclusion of vulnerable groups. This paper examines the construction of digital citizenship in the European Union, with particular attention to the European Digital Identity Wallet, reflecting on its implications for social justice and democratic participation. The study is grounded in a legal and philosophical framework, integrating insights from human rights law, critical technology studies, and social studies of innovation. It argues that, while digital citizenship is conceived as a vector of inclusion, it risks becoming a mechanism of inequality and control if robust safeguards are not implemented. The analysis underscores the need for public policies that guarantee transparency, proportionality, and independent oversight. It further suggests that digital citizenship should not be reduced to a technological instrument but reimagined as a space for emancipation and democratic participation, where human dignity remains the guiding principle.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.