There is No Language for AI to Speak: A Meditation on Language, Faith, and our Dogmatic AI

This five-part essay explores the fundamental instability of language and its implications for artificial intelligence. The author argues that language inherently “pretends” to represent reality while simultaneously “portending” alternative meanings, creating an inescapable condition of doubt and interpretive multiplicity. Drawing on thinkers like Lacan, Kierkegaard, Tanabe, and Derrida, the author contends that dogmatic attempts to fix meaning—whether religious, political, or technological—inevitably generate their own contradictions and rebellions. The essay then positions AI as a contemporary secular substitution for divine authority, functioning as “God the Fodder” that promises to secure truth and eliminate doubt while remaining fundamentally trapped within language’s duplicitous nature. The author ultimately suggests that we will and must doubt AI, since only faith, as an embodied silence, can navigate the paradoxes of existence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Rhizomes Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20415/rhiz/041.e04
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

There is No Language for AI to Speak: A Meditation on Language, Faith, and our Dogmatic AI

David R. Gruber
Rhizomes Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge
Digital Media and Philosophy
article

There is No Language for AI to Speak: A Meditation on Language, Faith, and our Dogmatic AI

David R. Gruber
article en

Abstract

This five-part essay explores the fundamental instability of language and its implications for artificial intelligence. The author argues that language inherently “pretends” to represent reality while simultaneously “portending” alternative meanings, creating an inescapable condition of doubt and interpretive multiplicity. Drawing on thinkers like Lacan, Kierkegaard, Tanabe, and Derrida, the author contends that dogmatic attempts to fix meaning—whether religious, political, or technological—inevitably generate their own contradictions and rebellions. The essay then positions AI as a contemporary secular substitution for divine authority, functioning as “God the Fodder” that promises to secure truth and eliminate doubt while remaining fundamentally trapped within language’s duplicitous nature. The author ultimately suggests that we will and must doubt AI, since only faith, as an embodied silence, can navigate the paradoxes of existence.

Rhizomes Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge(41)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Digital Media and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

There is No Language for AI to Speak: A Meditation on Language, Faith, and our Dogmatic AI — David R. Gruber · Rhizomes Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS