Characteristics, Attitudes and Preferences of an End-Stage Kidney Disease Population at the Beginning of an Exercise Program: A Pragmatic Multicenter Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This multicenter nonrandomized pragmatic trial (NCT04282616), offering different options for active support by an exercise facilitator (EF) in the dialysis unit, aims to explore the attitudes and preferences of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients in relation to their characteristics, capabilities and barriers. <b>Methods</b>: In six European dialysis units, an EF was set to offer to each ESKD patient able to walk four simple low-cost three-month interventions: (i) advised physical activity increase (U-PA-I); (ii) structured home-based walking exercise (S-HB-LI); (iii) in-hospital (pre/postdialysis) supervised walking and resistance low-intensity training (S-SU-LI); and (iv) performance assessment only (PPA). After collecting attitudes and perceptions of patients, the EF was available for counseling about the choice. Outcome measures were the percentage of engaged patients among the total population, the percentage of active interventions versus PPA and their distribution among the available options, as well as the factors related to patients' choices (anthropometry, clinical, exercise capacity, and others). <b>Results</b>: Of the 297 eligible patients, 221 met the inclusion criteria, 176 (59%) of whom chose to participate (males, <i>n</i> = 113; aged 68 ± 10 years). The patients' choices were as follows: S-SU-LI, (n = 80), S-HB-LI (n = 66), PPA (n = 25) and U-PA-I (n = 5). Patients in the LI group were significantly older (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and had a lower exercise capacity, as measured by the 6 min walking distance (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in sex, distance from the dialysis center, dialysis duration, or recruiting site were recorded. The main reasons for nonparticipation were not being interested (67%) or already active (22%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In this exploratory research, patients exhibited positive attitudes toward exercise training and abandoning a sedentary lifestyle when counseled by an EF and when offered the possibility to choose. As the patient profile becomes more comorbid and frail, supervised and/or lower-intensity programs are preferred.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041547
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics, Attitudes and Preferences of an End-Stage Kidney Disease Population at the Beginning of an Exercise Program: A Pragmatic Multicenter Trial

Anna Crepaldi, Alessio Di Maria, Fabio Manfredini, Claudia Momentè et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Characteristics, Attitudes and Preferences of an End-Stage Kidney Disease Population at the Beginning of an Exercise Program: A Pragmatic Multicenter Trial

Anna Crepaldi, Alessio Di Maria, Fabio Manfredini, Claudia Momentè, Giovanni Piva, Pablo Jesus Lopez-Soto, Alejandro Martin-Malo, Francisco Labrador, Alda Storari, Nicola Lamberti
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This multicenter nonrandomized pragmatic trial (NCT04282616), offering different options for active support by an exercise facilitator (EF) in the dialysis unit, aims to explore the attitudes and preferences of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients in relation to their characteristics, capabilities and barriers. <b>Methods</b>: In six European dialysis units, an EF was set to offer to each ESKD patient able to walk four simple low-cost three-month interventions: (i) advised physical activity increase (U-PA-I); (ii) structured home-based walking exercise (S-HB-LI); (iii) in-hospital (pre/postdialysis) supervised walking and resistance low-intensity training (S-SU-LI); and (iv) performance assessment only (PPA). After collecting attitudes and perceptions of patients, the EF was available for counseling about the choice. Outcome measures were the percentage of engaged patients among the total population, the percentage of active interventions versus PPA and their distribution among the available options, as well as the factors related to patients' choices (anthropometry, clinical, exercise capacity, and others). <b>Results</b>: Of the 297 eligible patients, 221 met the inclusion criteria, 176 (59%) of whom chose to participate (males, <i>n</i> = 113; aged 68 ± 10 years). The patients' choices were as follows: S-SU-LI, (n = 80), S-HB-LI (n = 66), PPA (n = 25) and U-PA-I (n = 5). Patients in the LI group were significantly older (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and had a lower exercise capacity, as measured by the 6 min walking distance (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in sex, distance from the dialysis center, dialysis duration, or recruiting site were recorded. The main reasons for nonparticipation were not being interested (67%) or already active (22%). <b>Conclusions</b>: In this exploratory research, patients exhibited positive attitudes toward exercise training and abandoning a sedentary lifestyle when counseled by an EF and when offered the possibility to choose. As the patient profile becomes more comorbid and frail, supervised and/or lower-intensity programs are preferred.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(4)
University of Verona (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (ES), Casa di Cura Villa Garda (IT), Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES), University of Córdoba (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.