Integrating Host Genetics and Clinical Setting in Machine Learning Models: Predicting COVID-19 Prognosis for Healthcare Decision-Making (The FeMiNa Study)

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: COVID-19 has made a tremendous impact, causing a massive number of deaths worldwide. The inadequacy of health facilities resulted in shortage of resources and exhaustion of frontline workers who had to manage in a short time many patients with no tools to prioritize those at high risk. This study intended to disclose the architecture of such complex disease and enhance the management of hospitalized patients, preventing severe outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective multicenter study aimed at refining the best predictive model for COVID-19 mortality, integrating 19 genetic and 13 clinical features. We trained three machine learning (ML) models (GBM, XGB and RF) on a dataset of 532 COVID-19 hospitalized Italian patients, among the 605 recruited during the first wave of the pandemic, when vaccines were not available. <b>Results:</b> All the models achieved great values for accuracy, AUROC, f1, f2 and PR-AUC metrics. XGB f1 optimization resulted in better performance providing fewer false positives (N<sub>f1</sub> = 26 versus N<sub>f2</sub> = 27, N<sub>PR-AUC</sub> = 29), and mostly false negatives (N<sub>f1</sub> = 63 versus N<sub>f2</sub> = 69, N<sub>PR-AUC</sub> = 69), being the main goal to answer. We next delved into the feature importance to understand which features contribute to the model decision: age was the main driver of mortality prediction, followed by ventilation. The remainder was equally distributed between genetic (<i>HLA-DRA</i> rs3135363, <i>PPARGC1A</i> rs192678, <i>CRP</i> rs2808635, <i>ABO</i> rs657152) and other clinical features, demonstrating that genetic data did not confound, but rather implemented, the power of the model. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our results suggest that integrating genetic and clinical data into ML models is crucial for identifying high-risk cases within the vast disease heterogeneity, enabling the P4-medicine approach to improve patient outcomes and support the healthcare system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040583
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Host Genetics and Clinical Setting in Machine Learning Models: Predicting COVID-19 Prognosis for Healthcare Decision-Making (The FeMiNa Study)

Massimiliano Castellazzi, Roberta D’Assante, Veronica Tisato, Francesca Salvatori et al.
Diagnostics
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Integrating Host Genetics and Clinical Setting in Machine Learning Models: Predicting COVID-19 Prognosis for Healthcare Decision-Making (The FeMiNa Study)

Massimiliano Castellazzi, Roberta D’Assante, Veronica Tisato, Francesca Salvatori, Donato Gemmati, Bianca Antonica, Miriana Grisafi, Rosanna Asselta, Elisabetta D’Aversa, Stefano Volpato, Elvezia Maria Paraboschi, Francesca Remelli, Salvatore Pernagallo, Ajay Vikram Singh, Alberto Maria Marra, Angelina Passaro, Antonio Cittadini
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: COVID-19 has made a tremendous impact, causing a massive number of deaths worldwide. The inadequacy of health facilities resulted in shortage of resources and exhaustion of frontline workers who had to manage in a short time many patients with no tools to prioritize those at high risk. This study intended to disclose the architecture of such complex disease and enhance the management of hospitalized patients, preventing severe outcomes. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective multicenter study aimed at refining the best predictive model for COVID-19 mortality, integrating 19 genetic and 13 clinical features. We trained three machine learning (ML) models (GBM, XGB and RF) on a dataset of 532 COVID-19 hospitalized Italian patients, among the 605 recruited during the first wave of the pandemic, when vaccines were not available. <b>Results:</b> All the models achieved great values for accuracy, AUROC, f1, f2 and PR-AUC metrics. XGB f1 optimization resulted in better performance providing fewer false positives (N<sub>f1</sub> = 26 versus N<sub>f2</sub> = 27, N<sub>PR-AUC</sub> = 29), and mostly false negatives (N<sub>f1</sub> = 63 versus N<sub>f2</sub> = 69, N<sub>PR-AUC</sub> = 69), being the main goal to answer. We next delved into the feature importance to understand which features contribute to the model decision: age was the main driver of mortality prediction, followed by ventilation. The remainder was equally distributed between genetic (<i>HLA-DRA</i> rs3135363, <i>PPARGC1A</i> rs192678, <i>CRP</i> rs2808635, <i>ABO</i> rs657152) and other clinical features, demonstrating that genetic data did not confound, but rather implemented, the power of the model. <b>Conclusions</b>: Our results suggest that integrating genetic and clinical data into ML models is crucial for identifying high-risk cases within the vast disease heterogeneity, enabling the P4-medicine approach to improve patient outcomes and support the healthcare system.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(4)
Humanitas University (IT), University of Ferrara (IT), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Ospedale Sant'Anna (IT), Parque Tecnológico de la Salud (ES), St. Anna Hospital (DE), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.