No systems transformation without systems literacy: Insights from CGIAR

CONTEXT: Agri-food systems face complex and intertwined social, ecological, economic and political challenges, that call for transformation. Systems approaches can help navigate these complexities by helping to sweep in perspectives, identify entry points to improve situations of concern, and minimize trade-offs. This requires systems literacy: the capacity to understand, identify and operationalize suitable systems approaches for specific problem types. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we assess how CGIAR engages with and pursues systems thinking, as an example of a leading organisation driving change in agricultural research for development (AR4D), and explore the challenges for operationalizing systems thinking across the partnership. METHODS: A qualitative approach was used combining a review of literature and semi-structured stakeholder interviews, ranging from current and past research staff, academics, and practitioners, to gather insights into the understanding and operationalization of systems thinking within the case study of CGIAR. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that despite a commitment to food system transformation, to which systems approaches are inherent, systems thinking is underutilized in CGIAR. The results of the interviews point to limited systems literacy, with diverse interpretations of ‘systems thinking’, scattered adoption of systems approaches, and little intentional selection of different systems approaches for different problematic situations. They underscore an opportunity to better benefit from systems approaches by more intentionally engaging with various Systems approaches and fostering ‘systems literacy’, encompassing systems knowledge, governance and investment. SIGNIFICANCE: Systems thinking offers practical methodologies and tools to improve the complex and interconnected challenges towards agri-food system transformation, yet its effective application would benefit from greater ‘systems literacy’ in AR4D.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104662
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No systems transformation without systems literacy: Insights from CGIAR

Lennart Woltering, Jon Hellin, Arwen Bailey, Eva Valencia Lenero et al.
Agricultural Systems
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

No systems transformation without systems literacy: Insights from CGIAR

Lennart Woltering, Jon Hellin, Arwen Bailey, Eva Valencia Lenero, Hanna Ewell, Katharina Schiller
article en

Abstract

CONTEXT: Agri-food systems face complex and intertwined social, ecological, economic and political challenges, that call for transformation. Systems approaches can help navigate these complexities by helping to sweep in perspectives, identify entry points to improve situations of concern, and minimize trade-offs. This requires systems literacy: the capacity to understand, identify and operationalize suitable systems approaches for specific problem types. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we assess how CGIAR engages with and pursues systems thinking, as an example of a leading organisation driving change in agricultural research for development (AR4D), and explore the challenges for operationalizing systems thinking across the partnership. METHODS: A qualitative approach was used combining a review of literature and semi-structured stakeholder interviews, ranging from current and past research staff, academics, and practitioners, to gather insights into the understanding and operationalization of systems thinking within the case study of CGIAR. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that despite a commitment to food system transformation, to which systems approaches are inherent, systems thinking is underutilized in CGIAR. The results of the interviews point to limited systems literacy, with diverse interpretations of ‘systems thinking’, scattered adoption of systems approaches, and little intentional selection of different systems approaches for different problematic situations. They underscore an opportunity to better benefit from systems approaches by more intentionally engaging with various Systems approaches and fostering ‘systems literacy’, encompassing systems knowledge, governance and investment. SIGNIFICANCE: Systems thinking offers practical methodologies and tools to improve the complex and interconnected challenges towards agri-food system transformation, yet its effective application would benefit from greater ‘systems literacy’ in AR4D.

Agricultural SystemsVol. 234
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

No systems transformation without systems literacy: Insights from CGIAR — Lennart Woltering, Jon Hellin, et al. · Agricultural Systems (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS