The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean: Regulating Outer Space as ‘Environment’

This article argues that ‘environment’ is not an auxiliary concern in the governance of outer space but its central structuring principle. Building on James Ormrod’s sociological framework, it reconstructs five regulatory ‘productions’ of outer space as environment: as a resource environment, a risk environment, a wilderness, a research environment, and a cultural environment. Each production reveals how environmental thinking shapes the legal and institutional architecture of space governance, from resource extraction and debris mitigation to planetary protection and heritage preservation. By situating environmental considerations at the core rather than the periphery of regulation, the article reframes the Outer Space Treaty’s (OST’s) principles of use, exploration, and non-appropriation as environmental norms. This unified view exposes the interdependence between commercial, scientific, and ethical dimensions of space activity and highlights the need for coherent, sustainability-oriented regulation. It concludes that recognizing outer space as environment provides a normative and interpretative framework capable of integrating fragmented legal regimes and guiding future law- and policy-making toward equitable and durable space governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Air and Space Law
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2026011
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean: Regulating Outer Space as ‘Environment’

Güneş Ünüvar
Air and Space Law
Space exploration and regulation
article

The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean: Regulating Outer Space as ‘Environment’

Güneş Ünüvar
article en

Abstract

This article argues that ‘environment’ is not an auxiliary concern in the governance of outer space but its central structuring principle. Building on James Ormrod’s sociological framework, it reconstructs five regulatory ‘productions’ of outer space as environment: as a resource environment, a risk environment, a wilderness, a research environment, and a cultural environment. Each production reveals how environmental thinking shapes the legal and institutional architecture of space governance, from resource extraction and debris mitigation to planetary protection and heritage preservation. By situating environmental considerations at the core rather than the periphery of regulation, the article reframes the Outer Space Treaty’s (OST’s) principles of use, exploration, and non-appropriation as environmental norms. This unified view exposes the interdependence between commercial, scientific, and ethical dimensions of space activity and highlights the need for coherent, sustainability-oriented regulation. It concludes that recognizing outer space as environment provides a normative and interpretative framework capable of integrating fragmented legal regimes and guiding future law- and policy-making toward equitable and durable space governance.

Air and Space LawVol. 51(Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Space exploration and regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.