The Potential of Napping in Automated Driving and User Preferences for Wake-Up Concepts—An Online Study

In automated driving, drivers may sleep during rides, making it important to study napping preferences and wake-up scenarios for human-centered system design. We conducted an online study with 280 participants, balanced by age and gender, examining how often, when, and how long individuals would nap if given the opportunity. The study also explored preferred wake-up methods when the vehicle nears the end of its operational design domain. Using a mixed 2 × 2 design, participants were assigned to one of two travel purposes (“commuting” vs. “holiday trip”) and two minimal risk conditions (rest area vs. hard shoulder). The results showed that 40% intended to sleep during automated driving, highlighting a strong interest in in-car sleeping. Wake-up preferences varied by travel purpose and minimal risk condition, with many favoring awakening before the drive ended. Participants also anticipated sleep inertia and desired post-wake-up support. The findings allow suggestions for designing wake-up concepts that mitigate sleep inertia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Ergonomics
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/tae2010003
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Potential of Napping in Automated Driving and User Preferences for Wake-Up Concepts—An Online Study

Markus Tomzig, Aaron Edelmann, Thomas Brand, Lena Rittger
Theoretical and Applied Ergonomics
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

The Potential of Napping in Automated Driving and User Preferences for Wake-Up Concepts—An Online Study

Markus Tomzig, Aaron Edelmann, Thomas Brand, Lena Rittger
article en

Abstract

In automated driving, drivers may sleep during rides, making it important to study napping preferences and wake-up scenarios for human-centered system design. We conducted an online study with 280 participants, balanced by age and gender, examining how often, when, and how long individuals would nap if given the opportunity. The study also explored preferred wake-up methods when the vehicle nears the end of its operational design domain. Using a mixed 2 × 2 design, participants were assigned to one of two travel purposes (“commuting” vs. “holiday trip”) and two minimal risk conditions (rest area vs. hard shoulder). The results showed that 40% intended to sleep during automated driving, highlighting a strong interest in in-car sleeping. Wake-up preferences varied by travel purpose and minimal risk condition, with many favoring awakening before the drive ended. Participants also anticipated sleep inertia and desired post-wake-up support. The findings allow suggestions for designing wake-up concepts that mitigate sleep inertia.

Theoretical and Applied ErgonomicsVol. 2(1)
Würzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences (Germany) (DE), Klinikum Ingolstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Potential of Napping in Automated Driving and User Preferences for Wake-Up Concepts—An Online Study — Markus Tomzig, Aaron Edelmann, et al. · Theoretical and Applied Ergonomics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS