Concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of ES-Cu-Captisol for Menkes disease
I read with interest the research letter to the JCI by Godoy-Molina et al. implying that elesclomol-copper (ES-Cu-Captisol) treatment improved neurodevelopmental outcomes, hair structure/pigmentation, and various neurochemical levels in two infants with Menkes disease caused by loss-of-function ATP7A variants.A critical factor not adequately explored is how the authors separated the effect of ES-Cu-Captisol on these parameters from that of copper histidinate (CuHis), an alternative copper formulation that each infant received concurrently (1).In fact, both infants (NP#1 and NP#2) received ES-Cu-Captisol only 1 day per week, versus CuHis for 6 days per week.Based on the respective doses reported, the percentage of weekly copper received from the ES-Cu-Captisol formulation was 7.7% of the total for NP#1 and 4.46% for NP#2.From scientific, medical, and clinical trial perspectives, it is problematic to "suggest that ES-Cu has therapeutic benefits on various tissues, particularly the brain" under these circumstances (1).The enhanced survival and variably improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in response to early treatment for NP#1 and NP#2 are laudable in the face of this difficult illness and entirely similar to those reported in larger Menkes disease cohorts treated with CuHis alone (2-4), including subjects with complete loss-offunction ATP7A variants (4).Any clinical and biochemical benefits in individuals NP#1 and NP#2 are therefore impossible to attribute to ES-Cu-Captisol.In contrast, the documented risks of ES-Cu-Captisol are notable.Godoy-Molina et al. report skin reactions to the drug (Supplemental Figure 2C) involving adipocyte necrosis in both individuals after subcutaneous injections of ES-Cu-Captisol (1).In the personal care and treatment of more than 150 patients with Menkes disease receiving CuHis injections (2-4), I have never witnessed skin reactions of this severity.The authors do not address the possible mechanism of this treatment-emergent adverse event, which may be related to the cellular toxicity and apoptotic effects of ES (5).
Authors
- Stephen G. Kaler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-926X)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 2026-02-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1172/jci201900
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 34.74
Funders
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration