Concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of ES-Cu-Captisol for Menkes disease

I read with interest the research letter to the JCI by Godoy-Molina et al. implying that elesclomol-copper (ES-Cu-Captisol) treatment improved neurodevelopmental outcomes, hair structure/pigmentation, and various neurochemical levels in two infants with Menkes disease caused by loss-of-function ATP7A variants.A critical factor not adequately explored is how the authors separated the effect of ES-Cu-Captisol on these parameters from that of copper histidinate (CuHis), an alternative copper formulation that each infant received concurrently (1).In fact, both infants (NP#1 and NP#2) received ES-Cu-Captisol only 1 day per week, versus CuHis for 6 days per week.Based on the respective doses reported, the percentage of weekly copper received from the ES-Cu-Captisol formulation was 7.7% of the total for NP#1 and 4.46% for NP#2.From scientific, medical, and clinical trial perspectives, it is problematic to "suggest that ES-Cu has therapeutic benefits on various tissues, particularly the brain" under these circumstances (1).The enhanced survival and variably improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in response to early treatment for NP#1 and NP#2 are laudable in the face of this difficult illness and entirely similar to those reported in larger Menkes disease cohorts treated with CuHis alone (2-4), including subjects with complete loss-offunction ATP7A variants (4).Any clinical and biochemical benefits in individuals NP#1 and NP#2 are therefore impossible to attribute to ES-Cu-Captisol.In contrast, the documented risks of ES-Cu-Captisol are notable.Godoy-Molina et al. report skin reactions to the drug (Supplemental Figure 2C) involving adipocyte necrosis in both individuals after subcutaneous injections of ES-Cu-Captisol (1).In the personal care and treatment of more than 150 patients with Menkes disease receiving CuHis injections (2-4), I have never witnessed skin reactions of this severity.The authors do not address the possible mechanism of this treatment-emergent adverse event, which may be related to the cellular toxicity and apoptotic effects of ES (5).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1172/jci201900
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of ES-Cu-Captisol for Menkes disease

Stephen G. Kaler
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
34.74
article

Concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of ES-Cu-Captisol for Menkes disease

Stephen G. Kaler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

I read with interest the research letter to the JCI by Godoy-Molina et al. implying that elesclomol-copper (ES-Cu-Captisol) treatment improved neurodevelopmental outcomes, hair structure/pigmentation, and various neurochemical levels in two infants with Menkes disease caused by loss-of-function ATP7A variants.A critical factor not adequately explored is how the authors separated the effect of ES-Cu-Captisol on these parameters from that of copper histidinate (CuHis), an alternative copper formulation that each infant received concurrently (1).In fact, both infants (NP#1 and NP#2) received ES-Cu-Captisol only 1 day per week, versus CuHis for 6 days per week.Based on the respective doses reported, the percentage of weekly copper received from the ES-Cu-Captisol formulation was 7.7% of the total for NP#1 and 4.46% for NP#2.From scientific, medical, and clinical trial perspectives, it is problematic to "suggest that ES-Cu has therapeutic benefits on various tissues, particularly the brain" under these circumstances (1).The enhanced survival and variably improved neurodevelopmental outcomes in response to early treatment for NP#1 and NP#2 are laudable in the face of this difficult illness and entirely similar to those reported in larger Menkes disease cohorts treated with CuHis alone (2-4), including subjects with complete loss-offunction ATP7A variants (4).Any clinical and biochemical benefits in individuals NP#1 and NP#2 are therefore impossible to attribute to ES-Cu-Captisol.In contrast, the documented risks of ES-Cu-Captisol are notable.Godoy-Molina et al. report skin reactions to the drug (Supplemental Figure 2C) involving adipocyte necrosis in both individuals after subcutaneous injections of ES-Cu-Captisol (1).In the personal care and treatment of more than 150 patients with Menkes disease receiving CuHis injections (2-4), I have never witnessed skin reactions of this severity.The authors do not address the possible mechanism of this treatment-emergent adverse event, which may be related to the cellular toxicity and apoptotic effects of ES (5).

Journal of Clinical InvestigationVol. 136(4)
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
34.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of ES-Cu-Captisol for Menkes disease — Stephen G. Kaler · Journal of Clinical Investigation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS