Do Digital Trade Rules Within the <scp>RTAs</scp> Promote Trade and Welfare Growth?

ABSTRACT This study employs the OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index framework to quantify changes in digital trade costs triggered by digital trade provisions within RTAs and incorporates these changes into a trade structure model that differentiates between intermediate and final goods. It assesses the trade and welfare impacts resulting from the implementation of digital trade rules under the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans‐Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA). Unlike traditional tariff concessions, digital trade rules—once implemented by a country—apply universally, thus significantly promoting trade for both member and non‐member countries. Further decomposition reveals that the changes in trade flows are primarily driven by intermediate goods. Welfare levels have substantially improved for CPTPP and DEPA members, mainly due to the welfare gains associated with reduced digital trade costs. Non‐member countries have also seen slight welfare improvements due to the spillover effects of these digital trade rules. Should China accede to either CPTPP or DEPA, it would generate positive trade and welfare effects for member countries, with China being the primary beneficiary. Non‐member countries would also benefit, albeit to a lesser extent than members, ultimately leading to an improvement in global welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70065
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Digital Trade Rules Within the RTAs Promote Trade and Welfare Growth?

Y. Jiang, Hao Xiao, Zijie Fan, Zijin Li et al.
World Economy
Global trade and economics
article

Do Digital Trade Rules Within the RTAs Promote Trade and Welfare Growth?

Y. Jiang, Hao Xiao, Zijie Fan, Zijin Li, Bo Meng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study employs the OECD Digital Services Trade Restrictiveness Index framework to quantify changes in digital trade costs triggered by digital trade provisions within RTAs and incorporates these changes into a trade structure model that differentiates between intermediate and final goods. It assesses the trade and welfare impacts resulting from the implementation of digital trade rules under the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans‐Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA). Unlike traditional tariff concessions, digital trade rules—once implemented by a country—apply universally, thus significantly promoting trade for both member and non‐member countries. Further decomposition reveals that the changes in trade flows are primarily driven by intermediate goods. Welfare levels have substantially improved for CPTPP and DEPA members, mainly due to the welfare gains associated with reduced digital trade costs. Non‐member countries have also seen slight welfare improvements due to the spillover effects of these digital trade rules. Should China accede to either CPTPP or DEPA, it would generate positive trade and welfare effects for member countries, with China being the primary beneficiary. Non‐member countries would also benefit, albeit to a lesser extent than members, ultimately leading to an improvement in global welfare.

World Economy
Hunan University (CN), Japan External Trade Organization (JP), Hunan Institute of Microbiology (CN), Hunan University of Technology and Business (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.