Comparative Analysis of Quadriceps Electromyography During Bodyweight Strength Exercises

Background: Although numerous exercises are prescribed for quadriceps femoris (QF) injury prevention and rehabilitation, few studies have compared QF muscle activation across commonly used bodyweight strength tasks. This study compared EMG activity of the rectus femoris proximal (RFP), rectus femoris medial (RFM), vastus lateralis (VL), and vastus medialis (VM) during seven bodyweight exercises with different stance positions. Methods: Twenty healthy male amateur football players performed three staggered-stance exercises (Split Squat, Bulgarian Split Squat, Backward Lunge), three parallel-stance exercises (Half-Squat, Russian Belt, Reverse Nordic), and one single-leg stance exercise (Lateral Step-Down). Surface EMG signals were recorded, and mean peak EMG values for each exercise were averaged and normalized to maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVIC). Results: The highest VM and VL activation occurred during the Bulgarian Split Squat (VM: 85.4%; VL: 67.6% MVIC) and Backward Lunge (VM: 74.5%; VL: 59.9% MVIC). RFP and RFM showed the greatest activation during the Russian Belt (RFP: 49.8%; RFM: 39.6% MVIC) and Backward Lunge (RFP: 40.4%; RFM: 31.4% MVIC). VM and VL activation were significantly higher than RFP and RFM activation for all exercises except for Russian Belt and Reverse Nordic (p < 0.005). Conclusions: Exercises imposing greater knee stability demands preferentially activated VM and VL, whereas exercises with longer knee extensor lever arms maximized rectus femoris activation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041940
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Quadriceps Electromyography During Bodyweight Strength Exercises

Aaron Miralles‐Iborra, Francisco J. Vera-Garcia, Juan Del Coso, Víctor Moreno-Pérez et al.
Applied Sciences
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Comparative Analysis of Quadriceps Electromyography During Bodyweight Strength Exercises

Aaron Miralles‐Iborra, Francisco J. Vera-Garcia, Juan Del Coso, Víctor Moreno-Pérez, Jesús Vera-Cartagena
article en

Abstract

Background: Although numerous exercises are prescribed for quadriceps femoris (QF) injury prevention and rehabilitation, few studies have compared QF muscle activation across commonly used bodyweight strength tasks. This study compared EMG activity of the rectus femoris proximal (RFP), rectus femoris medial (RFM), vastus lateralis (VL), and vastus medialis (VM) during seven bodyweight exercises with different stance positions. Methods: Twenty healthy male amateur football players performed three staggered-stance exercises (Split Squat, Bulgarian Split Squat, Backward Lunge), three parallel-stance exercises (Half-Squat, Russian Belt, Reverse Nordic), and one single-leg stance exercise (Lateral Step-Down). Surface EMG signals were recorded, and mean peak EMG values for each exercise were averaged and normalized to maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVIC). Results: The highest VM and VL activation occurred during the Bulgarian Split Squat (VM: 85.4%; VL: 67.6% MVIC) and Backward Lunge (VM: 74.5%; VL: 59.9% MVIC). RFP and RFM showed the greatest activation during the Russian Belt (RFP: 49.8%; RFM: 39.6% MVIC) and Backward Lunge (RFP: 40.4%; RFM: 31.4% MVIC). VM and VL activation were significantly higher than RFP and RFM activation for all exercises except for Russian Belt and Reverse Nordic (p < 0.005). Conclusions: Exercises imposing greater knee stability demands preferentially activated VM and VL, whereas exercises with longer knee extensor lever arms maximized rectus femoris activation.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(4)
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.