Social rights, solidarism, and the market society: Afterword to the Foreword by Nehal Bhuta

Abstract This Afterword builds on Nehal Bhuta’s Foreword by revisiting the intellectual and historical underpinnings of social rights, particularly their emergence in the nineteenth century through solidarist political philosophy. It argues that solidarism, unlike both liberal individualism and Marxist collectivism, envisioned the political community as grounded in spontaneous social bonds of mutual responsibility rather than in contracts or class struggle. The Afterword further explores how social rights were historically entangled with capitalism, noting that while originally conceived to counterbalance market forces, their efficacy is now weakened by the neoliberal transformation of civil and political rights. Contemporary market dynamics—exemplified by gig economy practices—threaten to erode the emancipatory potential of social rights. Unless social rights are reconnected to democratic principles and the material conditions of political participation, they risk losing relevance in the face of growing inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moag003
Primary Topic
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social rights, solidarism, and the market society: Afterword to the Foreword by Nehal Bhuta

Graziella Romeo
International Journal of Constitutional Law
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
article

Social rights, solidarism, and the market society: Afterword to the Foreword by Nehal Bhuta

Graziella Romeo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This Afterword builds on Nehal Bhuta’s Foreword by revisiting the intellectual and historical underpinnings of social rights, particularly their emergence in the nineteenth century through solidarist political philosophy. It argues that solidarism, unlike both liberal individualism and Marxist collectivism, envisioned the political community as grounded in spontaneous social bonds of mutual responsibility rather than in contracts or class struggle. The Afterword further explores how social rights were historically entangled with capitalism, noting that while originally conceived to counterbalance market forces, their efficacy is now weakened by the neoliberal transformation of civil and political rights. Contemporary market dynamics—exemplified by gig economy practices—threaten to erode the emancipatory potential of social rights. Unless social rights are reconnected to democratic principles and the material conditions of political participation, they risk losing relevance in the face of growing inequality.

International Journal of Constitutional Law
Bocconi University (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.