Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Strict Product Liability in the UK: Time for Reform

Digitalisation and advanced communication technologies are poised to enable the deployment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in non-segregated airspace through Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), including those that are autonomous. This transition shifts the primary source of accident risk from human error to product defect. As such, it is critical to assess the adequacy of the relevant compensation mechanisms. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) is the primary tool that imposes strict liability on producers for defective products in the UK; however, it was drafted before the widespread deployment of interconnected cyber-physical systems and self-learning algorithms. This article evaluates the application of the CPA 1987 to UAS, arguing it is unable to cater for digital technologies, including (but not limited) to defining the ‘product’, establishing post-supply liability, and addressing the burden of proof for AI applications. Furthermore, it argues that reliance on the operatorfocused section 76 (2)–(4) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (CAA 1982) transfers the burden of product defects onto UAS operators. Building upon the new EU Product Liability Directive (PLD), this article concludes that the existing product liability framework of the UK is inadequate and requires reform.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Air and Space Law
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2026010
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Strict Product Liability in the UK: Time for Reform

Furkan Bulut, George Leloudas
Air and Space Law
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Strict Product Liability in the UK: Time for Reform

Furkan Bulut, George Leloudas
article en

Abstract

Digitalisation and advanced communication technologies are poised to enable the deployment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in non-segregated airspace through Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS), including those that are autonomous. This transition shifts the primary source of accident risk from human error to product defect. As such, it is critical to assess the adequacy of the relevant compensation mechanisms. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA 1987) is the primary tool that imposes strict liability on producers for defective products in the UK; however, it was drafted before the widespread deployment of interconnected cyber-physical systems and self-learning algorithms. This article evaluates the application of the CPA 1987 to UAS, arguing it is unable to cater for digital technologies, including (but not limited) to defining the ‘product’, establishing post-supply liability, and addressing the burden of proof for AI applications. Furthermore, it argues that reliance on the operatorfocused section 76 (2)–(4) of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 (CAA 1982) transfers the burden of product defects onto UAS operators. Building upon the new EU Product Liability Directive (PLD), this article concludes that the existing product liability framework of the UK is inadequate and requires reform.

Air and Space LawVol. 51(Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.