Learning styles and their association with academic achievement ın endodontics among undergraduate dental students: a cross-sectional study

Learning styles reflect the ways in which individuals acquire and process information. Understanding students’ preferences in dental education can inform the development of more effective teaching strategies. This study examined the learning styles of undergraduate dental the VARK model. A total of 386 dental students in their second, third, fourth and fifth academic grades were included in the study. To determine their learning styles, they were asked to complete a 16-item multiple-choice questionnaire based on the VARK learning model via Google Forms. Learning styles were classified as unimodal, bimodal, trimodal or quadmodal according to the official VARK guidelines. The association between learning styles and variables such as academic grade, biological sex and academic performance was examined. Differences in quantitative variables among groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), while differences in categorical variables were analysed using the chi-square test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The students who participated in the survey preferred the auditory (A) style the most. This was followed by the kinaesthetic (K), visual (V) and reading/writing (R) styles. However, no significant correlation was found between students’ preferred learning style and their theoretical and practical endodontic GPAs. When comparing second and fifth grade students, a significantly higher proportion of second grade students preferred the reading/writing (R) style than fifth grade students. Females preferred the reading/writing style more than males did. The distribution of learning styles was as follows: 36.7% quadmodal, 14.5% trimodal, 16.5% bimodal, and 32.3% unimodal. However, no significant differences were found when comparing GPAs, biological sex and grade between unimodal or multiple learning models. Although considering individual learning styles can improve teaching effectiveness, it does not, by itself, determine academic achievement. Integrating flexible, student-centred teaching approaches into dental and endodontic curricula could provide more effective, personalised learning experiences. To improve generalisability and better understand the role of learning styles in professional education, multicentre longitudinal studies involving diverse disciplines and cultural backgrounds are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08816-5
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning styles and their association with academic achievement ın endodontics among undergraduate dental students: a cross-sectional study

Tunahan Döken, Tuğçe İldeniz
BMC Medical Education
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

Learning styles and their association with academic achievement ın endodontics among undergraduate dental students: a cross-sectional study

Tunahan Döken, Tuğçe İldeniz
article en

Abstract

Learning styles reflect the ways in which individuals acquire and process information. Understanding students’ preferences in dental education can inform the development of more effective teaching strategies. This study examined the learning styles of undergraduate dental the VARK model. A total of 386 dental students in their second, third, fourth and fifth academic grades were included in the study. To determine their learning styles, they were asked to complete a 16-item multiple-choice questionnaire based on the VARK learning model via Google Forms. Learning styles were classified as unimodal, bimodal, trimodal or quadmodal according to the official VARK guidelines. The association between learning styles and variables such as academic grade, biological sex and academic performance was examined. Differences in quantitative variables among groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), while differences in categorical variables were analysed using the chi-square test. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The students who participated in the survey preferred the auditory (A) style the most. This was followed by the kinaesthetic (K), visual (V) and reading/writing (R) styles. However, no significant correlation was found between students’ preferred learning style and their theoretical and practical endodontic GPAs. When comparing second and fifth grade students, a significantly higher proportion of second grade students preferred the reading/writing (R) style than fifth grade students. Females preferred the reading/writing style more than males did. The distribution of learning styles was as follows: 36.7% quadmodal, 14.5% trimodal, 16.5% bimodal, and 32.3% unimodal. However, no significant differences were found when comparing GPAs, biological sex and grade between unimodal or multiple learning models. Although considering individual learning styles can improve teaching effectiveness, it does not, by itself, determine academic achievement. Integrating flexible, student-centred teaching approaches into dental and endodontic curricula could provide more effective, personalised learning experiences. To improve generalisability and better understand the role of learning styles in professional education, multicentre longitudinal studies involving diverse disciplines and cultural backgrounds are recommended.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.