Why are bone torsional rigidity and stiffness measurements often inaccurate?

• Torsion tests using only machine-mounted angle transducers yield flawed stiffness measurements. • A new setup and guidelines enhance torsion measurement accuracy. • FE-twin modelling and microstructural analysis validate the new method and findings. This study aims to raise awareness about the widespread use of flawed torsion test setups for measuring the stiffness-related torsional mechanical properties of bone, both in previous studies and in current practice. The widely adopted machine-mounted angle transducer (MMAT) introduces significant measurement errors by capturing combined rotations from the specimen, machine components, and fixtures, including slippage and mechanical tolerances, rather than the true rotation of the bone specimen itself. This results in distorted estimations of torsional rigidity and stiffness, undermining the accuracy of biomechanical analyses and the design of orthopaedic devices. To correct this, a specimen-mounted angle transducer (SMAT) was developed using standard laboratory equipment, including linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs) and metal pins. The SMAT focuses solely on the central bone specimen’s rotation, offering more precise measurements. Torsion tests were conducted on eight porcine femur samples, and finite-element twin (FE-twin) models were developed through 3D scanning of bone geometry. These models were calibrated using MMAT and SMAT data to evaluate differences in torsional rigidity and shear modulus. The results revealed significant discrepancies between MMAT-based data and literature values, while SMAT-based tests aligned more accurately with theoretical predictions and strain gauge measurements. Additionally, scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses highlighted microstructural differences between fractured and unfractured bones. The findings underscore the importance of accurate torsion testing for clinical and research applications, offering improved methods for designing orthopaedic devices and assessing bone health. This paper delivers an important message: bone torsional rigidity and stiffness measurements are unreliable unless the torsion test setup includes direct measurement sensors, either contact or non-contact, mounted on or focused directly on the specimen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.120857
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why are bone torsional rigidity and stiffness measurements often inaccurate?

Chayanon Hansapinyo, M. G. Shaikh, Hexin Zhang, Terry Y.P. Yuen
Measurement
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Why are bone torsional rigidity and stiffness measurements often inaccurate?

Chayanon Hansapinyo, M. G. Shaikh, Hexin Zhang, Terry Y.P. Yuen
article en

Abstract

• Torsion tests using only machine-mounted angle transducers yield flawed stiffness measurements. • A new setup and guidelines enhance torsion measurement accuracy. • FE-twin modelling and microstructural analysis validate the new method and findings. This study aims to raise awareness about the widespread use of flawed torsion test setups for measuring the stiffness-related torsional mechanical properties of bone, both in previous studies and in current practice. The widely adopted machine-mounted angle transducer (MMAT) introduces significant measurement errors by capturing combined rotations from the specimen, machine components, and fixtures, including slippage and mechanical tolerances, rather than the true rotation of the bone specimen itself. This results in distorted estimations of torsional rigidity and stiffness, undermining the accuracy of biomechanical analyses and the design of orthopaedic devices. To correct this, a specimen-mounted angle transducer (SMAT) was developed using standard laboratory equipment, including linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs) and metal pins. The SMAT focuses solely on the central bone specimen’s rotation, offering more precise measurements. Torsion tests were conducted on eight porcine femur samples, and finite-element twin (FE-twin) models were developed through 3D scanning of bone geometry. These models were calibrated using MMAT and SMAT data to evaluate differences in torsional rigidity and shear modulus. The results revealed significant discrepancies between MMAT-based data and literature values, while SMAT-based tests aligned more accurately with theoretical predictions and strain gauge measurements. Additionally, scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses highlighted microstructural differences between fractured and unfractured bones. The findings underscore the importance of accurate torsion testing for clinical and research applications, offering improved methods for designing orthopaedic devices and assessing bone health. This paper delivers an important message: bone torsional rigidity and stiffness measurements are unreliable unless the torsion test setup includes direct measurement sensors, either contact or non-contact, mounted on or focused directly on the specimen.

MeasurementVol. 270
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Guangxi Medical University (CN), Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (CN), Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), Guangxi University of Science and Technology (CN), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Chiang Mai University (TH), King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (TH), Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia (MY), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.