New Zealanders’ Connection to the Night Sky

Artificial light at night (ALAN) provides many benefits to people, but the resulting erosion of natural darkness is increasingly recognised as negatively affecting human and environmental health, scientific endeavours and cultural connection to the night sky. This first nationally representative survey assessed New Zealanders’ connection with the night sky and their attitudes towards ALAN across five domains: astronomy, environment, energy consumption, public health, and culture. We found New Zealanders strongly appreciate the night sky: 50% of respondents strongly/totally agreed and another 27% moderately agreed that preserving dark night skies is important to them. Our analyses revealed that this sentiment (and wider night sky connectedness) was most consistently predicted by positive attitudes towards darkness (particularly beliefs linking night‐time darkness to human wellbeing) and frequency of gazing upwards. Contrary to previous assumptions, demographic factors (including sex, age, and ethnicity) and urban–rural location were not significant predictors of either night sky connectedness or support for preservation. While ALAN was regarded as an important issue across domains, concern was greatest for astronomy and environmental impacts, and lowest in the cultural domain. The strong public support identified here reinforces the social licence of initiatives establishing dark sky locations and strengthening national lighting guidelines and regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/kot2.70013
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Zealanders’ Connection to the Night Sky

Jeff Dalley, Ellen Cieraad
Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
article

New Zealanders’ Connection to the Night Sky

Jeff Dalley, Ellen Cieraad
article en

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) provides many benefits to people, but the resulting erosion of natural darkness is increasingly recognised as negatively affecting human and environmental health, scientific endeavours and cultural connection to the night sky. This first nationally representative survey assessed New Zealanders’ connection with the night sky and their attitudes towards ALAN across five domains: astronomy, environment, energy consumption, public health, and culture. We found New Zealanders strongly appreciate the night sky: 50% of respondents strongly/totally agreed and another 27% moderately agreed that preserving dark night skies is important to them. Our analyses revealed that this sentiment (and wider night sky connectedness) was most consistently predicted by positive attitudes towards darkness (particularly beliefs linking night‐time darkness to human wellbeing) and frequency of gazing upwards. Contrary to previous assumptions, demographic factors (including sex, age, and ethnicity) and urban–rural location were not significant predictors of either night sky connectedness or support for preservation. While ALAN was regarded as an important issue across domains, concern was greatest for astronomy and environmental impacts, and lowest in the cultural domain. The strong public support identified here reinforces the social licence of initiatives establishing dark sky locations and strengthening national lighting guidelines and regulations.

Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences OnlineVol. 21(1)
Leiden University (NL), Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology (NZ), Department of Conservation (NZ)
Pennington Biomedical Research Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.