How Do Future Visions Shape the Field of Human-Computer Interaction?

Visions for the future of computing, such as those on Ubiquitous Computing or Tangible Interfaces, are highly cited and frequently used in teaching. Yet, we know little about the practical value of these visions for research on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) or how HCI researchers engage with them individually and collectively. To address this gap, we conducted a survey with 172 HCI researchers. We identified key benefits and pitfalls as well as specific uses of visions by researchers. Researchers appreciate how visions guide us, drive us, and initiate new fields. Simultaneously, researchers acknowledge how visions create hype, restrict our creativity, and make us disregard real-world problems. Based on these insights, we derive tensions related to the pursuit of visions and discuss critical reading practices. Our paper offers a metascientific account of visions in the HCI field along with tools for critical reflection when engaging with them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791038
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Future Visions Shape the Field of Human-Computer Interaction?

Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, Kasper Anders Søren Hornbæk, Jens Emil; id_orcid 0000-0002-9566-7195 Grønbæk
1 citations
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

How Do Future Visions Shape the Field of Human-Computer Interaction?

Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, Kasper Anders Søren Hornbæk, Jens Emil; id_orcid 0000-0002-9566-7195 Grønbæk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Visions for the future of computing, such as those on Ubiquitous Computing or Tangible Interfaces, are highly cited and frequently used in teaching. Yet, we know little about the practical value of these visions for research on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) or how HCI researchers engage with them individually and collectively. To address this gap, we conducted a survey with 172 HCI researchers. We identified key benefits and pitfalls as well as specific uses of visions by researchers. Researchers appreciate how visions guide us, drive us, and initiate new fields. Simultaneously, researchers acknowledge how visions create hype, restrict our creativity, and make us disregard real-world problems. Based on these insights, we derive tensions related to the pursuit of visions and discuss critical reading practices. Our paper offers a metascientific account of visions in the HCI field along with tools for critical reflection when engaging with them.

University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK)
Aarhus Universitet, Villum Fonden, European Commission, Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond, European Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.