Ciprofloxacin Versus Fosfomycin for Empirical Prophylaxis Before Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Clinical, Microbiological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective Study

Background<b>:</b> Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy remains the gold standard in diagnosing prostate cancer, but is associated with infectious and non-infectious complications. Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance and regulatory restrictions have prompted evaluation of alternative prophylactic strategies, including fluoroquinolone-sparing agents and targeted prophylaxis. This study compared ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin as empirical prophylactic agents, focusing on microbiological concordance, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods<b>:</b> In this prospective observational study, 265 men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy received empirical antibiotic prophylaxis with either ciprofloxacin (<i>n</i> = 146) or fosfomycin trometamol (<i>n</i> = 119). Rectal swabs were obtained prior to biopsy, and antimicrobial susceptibility was analyzed post hoc. Infectious and non-infectious complications were recorded. Lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS), erectile function (IIEF-5), and patient-reported quality of life were assessed before and after biopsy. Results<b>:</b> Microbiological concordance between administered prophylaxis and rectal flora susceptibility was higher in the ciprofloxacin group than in the fosfomycin group (80.1% vs. 65.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), while resistance rates were similar (10.9% vs. 10.2%). Post-biopsy fever occurred in 5.3% of patients, and hospitalization was required in 3.1%, with no significant differences between prophylaxis groups. IPSS increased significantly after biopsy (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while IIEF-5 scores remained unchanged. Patients with microbiological concordance reported significantly better post-biopsy quality of life (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Conclusions<b>:</b> Ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin showed similar safety profiles as empirical prophylaxis before transrectal prostate biopsy. Although ciprofloxacin achieved higher microbiological concordance, fosfomycin remains a viable alternative. The link between microbial concordance and improved patient-reported quality of life underscores the importance of targeted prophylaxis and supports antimicrobial stewardship in prostate cancer diagnostics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Sciences
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14010091
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ciprofloxacin Versus Fosfomycin for Empirical Prophylaxis Before Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Clinical, Microbiological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective Study

Darijus Skaudickas, Edgaras Buržinskis, Ieva Janulaitytė, Astra Vitkauskienė et al.
Medical Sciences
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Ciprofloxacin Versus Fosfomycin for Empirical Prophylaxis Before Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Clinical, Microbiological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes from a Prospective Study

Darijus Skaudickas, Edgaras Buržinskis, Ieva Janulaitytė, Astra Vitkauskienė, Guoda Burzinskiene, Albinas Naudziunas
article en

Abstract

Background<b>:</b> Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy remains the gold standard in diagnosing prostate cancer, but is associated with infectious and non-infectious complications. Increasing fluoroquinolone resistance and regulatory restrictions have prompted evaluation of alternative prophylactic strategies, including fluoroquinolone-sparing agents and targeted prophylaxis. This study compared ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin as empirical prophylactic agents, focusing on microbiological concordance, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods<b>:</b> In this prospective observational study, 265 men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy received empirical antibiotic prophylaxis with either ciprofloxacin (<i>n</i> = 146) or fosfomycin trometamol (<i>n</i> = 119). Rectal swabs were obtained prior to biopsy, and antimicrobial susceptibility was analyzed post hoc. Infectious and non-infectious complications were recorded. Lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS), erectile function (IIEF-5), and patient-reported quality of life were assessed before and after biopsy. Results<b>:</b> Microbiological concordance between administered prophylaxis and rectal flora susceptibility was higher in the ciprofloxacin group than in the fosfomycin group (80.1% vs. 65.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.007), while resistance rates were similar (10.9% vs. 10.2%). Post-biopsy fever occurred in 5.3% of patients, and hospitalization was required in 3.1%, with no significant differences between prophylaxis groups. IPSS increased significantly after biopsy (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while IIEF-5 scores remained unchanged. Patients with microbiological concordance reported significantly better post-biopsy quality of life (<i>p</i> = 0.006). Conclusions<b>:</b> Ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin showed similar safety profiles as empirical prophylaxis before transrectal prostate biopsy. Although ciprofloxacin achieved higher microbiological concordance, fosfomycin remains a viable alternative. The link between microbial concordance and improved patient-reported quality of life underscores the importance of targeted prophylaxis and supports antimicrobial stewardship in prostate cancer diagnostics.

Medical SciencesVol. 14(1)
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.