Assessing personality profile: A qualitative study from drug abuse rehabilitation policies

This article outlines a qualitative methodological framework for evaluating personality profiles within drug abuse rehabilitation systems and policy environments. The protocol combines expert-led Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with a systematic analysis of social research inquiry (Litmas) documents to assess psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with recovery processes. Eight experts from psychiatry, psychology, correctional facilities, and national substance abuse rehabilitation policy participated in the focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was carried out to guarantee analytical transparency and cross-source triangulation. The protocol showcases how psychosocial characteristics can be systematically connected to rehabilitation practices and policy execution across health and correctional systems. This approach aims to assist in assessing the quality of rehabilitation programs and inform policy decisions based on evidence, especially in settings involving multiple sectors. <b>Key methodological features of the protocol include:</b>1.Integration of expert-based FGDs and institutional document analysis to support data source triangulation.2.Analyzing rehabilitation practices and policy contexts in relation to personality-related constructs using systematic thematic methods.3.A framework that can be reused to support the evaluation of rehabilitation systems in various sectors from a policy perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103831
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing personality profile: A qualitative study from drug abuse rehabilitation policies

Ismiyati Yuliatun, Setia Asyanti, Muhammad Japar, Eny Purwandari et al.
MethodsX
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Assessing personality profile: A qualitative study from drug abuse rehabilitation policies

Ismiyati Yuliatun, Setia Asyanti, Muhammad Japar, Eny Purwandari, Ema Madyaningrum, Rois Santria Giri
article en

Abstract

This article outlines a qualitative methodological framework for evaluating personality profiles within drug abuse rehabilitation systems and policy environments. The protocol combines expert-led Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with a systematic analysis of social research inquiry (Litmas) documents to assess psychosocial risk and protective factors associated with recovery processes. Eight experts from psychiatry, psychology, correctional facilities, and national substance abuse rehabilitation policy participated in the focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was carried out to guarantee analytical transparency and cross-source triangulation. The protocol showcases how psychosocial characteristics can be systematically connected to rehabilitation practices and policy execution across health and correctional systems. This approach aims to assist in assessing the quality of rehabilitation programs and inform policy decisions based on evidence, especially in settings involving multiple sectors. <b>Key methodological features of the protocol include:</b>1.Integration of expert-based FGDs and institutional document analysis to support data source triangulation.2.Analyzing rehabilitation practices and policy contexts in relation to personality-related constructs using systematic thematic methods.3.A framework that can be reused to support the evaluation of rehabilitation systems in various sectors from a policy perspective.

MethodsXVol. 16
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID), Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember (ID), Balai Arkeologi Sulawesi Selatan (ID), Surin Hospital (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.