Optimizing Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy: Dosimetric Comparison of 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT: Experience at a Single Oncology Center

Background & Objective: Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of cervical cancer treatment. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of three different external beam radiotherapy treatments: Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and Volume-Modulated Radiation Therapy (VMAT), with the aim of optimizing cervical cancer treatment. Materials & Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 10 patients, averaging 56 years old and mostly with squamous cell carcinoma, treated with Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy radiotherapy from January to December 2023. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy plans using computed tomography images with contours were evaluated for dosimetric quality. Results: IMRT and VMAT improved target coverage and reduced doses of organs at risk compared to 3D-CRT. IMRT lowered rectal and bladder doses by 2.51 Gy and 4.94 Gy, respectively, while VMAT reduced them by 2.82 Gy and 5.05 Gy. Both techniques also decreased exposure to the small bowel (IMRT: 1.6 Gy; VMAT: 2.8 Gy) and femoral heads (~0.2 Gy). They offered better conformity but required longer planning and treatment times. Conclusion: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy are techniques for cervical cancer treatment. IMRT offers precise radiation delivery, sparing surrounding tissues, making it suitable for tumors near critical structures or sensitive organs. VMAT, delivering high doses rapidly, is still ideal for patients with difficulty staying. The choice of treatment depends on collaboration among the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, patient, and available facility resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24200/jogcr.11.3.192
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy: Dosimetric Comparison of 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT: Experience at a Single Oncology Center

Oussama Nhila, Mohamed Hilal, Ahlam Azalmad
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer Research
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Optimizing Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy: Dosimetric Comparison of 3D-CRT, IMRT, and VMAT: Experience at a Single Oncology Center

Oussama Nhila, Mohamed Hilal, Ahlam Azalmad
article en

Abstract

Background & Objective: Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of cervical cancer treatment. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of three different external beam radiotherapy treatments: Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and Volume-Modulated Radiation Therapy (VMAT), with the aim of optimizing cervical cancer treatment. Materials & Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 10 patients, averaging 56 years old and mostly with squamous cell carcinoma, treated with Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy radiotherapy from January to December 2023. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy plans using computed tomography images with contours were evaluated for dosimetric quality. Results: IMRT and VMAT improved target coverage and reduced doses of organs at risk compared to 3D-CRT. IMRT lowered rectal and bladder doses by 2.51 Gy and 4.94 Gy, respectively, while VMAT reduced them by 2.82 Gy and 5.05 Gy. Both techniques also decreased exposure to the small bowel (IMRT: 1.6 Gy; VMAT: 2.8 Gy) and femoral heads (~0.2 Gy). They offered better conformity but required longer planning and treatment times. Conclusion: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy are techniques for cervical cancer treatment. IMRT offers precise radiation delivery, sparing surrounding tissues, making it suitable for tumors near critical structures or sensitive organs. VMAT, delivering high doses rapidly, is still ideal for patients with difficulty staying. The choice of treatment depends on collaboration among the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, patient, and available facility resources.

Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Cancer ResearchVol. 11(3)
Hôpital régional (CH), Université Hassan 1er (MA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.