Disentangling the effects of streamflow permanence and land use on the β‐diversity of Odonata assemblages in the Pampa grasslands

Abstract Changes in streamflow permanence regime and in land use intensity surrounding streams can greatly affect the distribution of aquatic insects and the ecosystem services that they provide. However, hydrological variation may alter land use impacts on aquatic insect assemblages. Therefore, untangling the effects of flow permanence and landscape composition on β‐diversity is key to predicting the effects of land use and climate change on aquatic insect assemblages, especially in modified biomes such as the South American subtropical grasslands (Pampa). Here, we surveyed the composition of Odonata assemblages in low‐order streams differing in their flow permanence and type of land cover to test whether st reamflow permanence and landscape composition drive Odonata β‐diversity patterns in the Brazilian Pampa. Specifically, we assessed the extent to which β‐diversity replacement and nestedness components vary between historically ‘perennial’ (with continuous flow all year‐round) and ‘intermittent’ streams (which dry part of the year) along a gradient of anthropogenic land cover. Flow permanence and anthropogenically impacted land cover independently influenced overall β‐diversity (and the turnover component), while anthropogenic land cover alone influenced the nestedness component. These findings suggest that intermittent flow in the stream channel throughout the year and landscape encroachment lead to the filtering out of flow‐sensitive Odonata and favour drought‐adapted taxa, while natural land use favours the occurrence of specialist taxa in Pampa streams. This study helps disentangle the mechanisms structuring the distribution of Odonata along gradients of hydrological permanence and land use in southern Brazilian grassland streams. These results are useful to predict the responses of Odonata biodiversity to streamflow regime change in landscapes under increasing environmental pressure and water surface loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Austral Entomology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.70054
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling the effects of streamflow permanence and land use on the β‐diversity of Odonata assemblages in the Pampa grasslands

Eduardo Guimarães Périco, Karla Petry, Samuel Renner, Göran Sahlén et al.
Austral Entomology
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
article

Disentangling the effects of streamflow permanence and land use on the β‐diversity of Odonata assemblages in the Pampa grasslands

Eduardo Guimarães Périco, Karla Petry, Samuel Renner, Göran Sahlén, Mateus Marques Pires
article en

Abstract

Abstract Changes in streamflow permanence regime and in land use intensity surrounding streams can greatly affect the distribution of aquatic insects and the ecosystem services that they provide. However, hydrological variation may alter land use impacts on aquatic insect assemblages. Therefore, untangling the effects of flow permanence and landscape composition on β‐diversity is key to predicting the effects of land use and climate change on aquatic insect assemblages, especially in modified biomes such as the South American subtropical grasslands (Pampa). Here, we surveyed the composition of Odonata assemblages in low‐order streams differing in their flow permanence and type of land cover to test whether st reamflow permanence and landscape composition drive Odonata β‐diversity patterns in the Brazilian Pampa. Specifically, we assessed the extent to which β‐diversity replacement and nestedness components vary between historically ‘perennial’ (with continuous flow all year‐round) and ‘intermittent’ streams (which dry part of the year) along a gradient of anthropogenic land cover. Flow permanence and anthropogenically impacted land cover independently influenced overall β‐diversity (and the turnover component), while anthropogenic land cover alone influenced the nestedness component. These findings suggest that intermittent flow in the stream channel throughout the year and landscape encroachment lead to the filtering out of flow‐sensitive Odonata and favour drought‐adapted taxa, while natural land use favours the occurrence of specialist taxa in Pampa streams. This study helps disentangle the mechanisms structuring the distribution of Odonata along gradients of hydrological permanence and land use in southern Brazilian grassland streams. These results are useful to predict the responses of Odonata biodiversity to streamflow regime change in landscapes under increasing environmental pressure and water surface loss.

Austral EntomologyVol. 65(1)
Univates (BR), Halmstad University (SE)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.