Ulrike Felt (2025) Contesting the Chronopolitics of Research

How long will you need to read this review?Book reviews are much quicker to ingest than books themselves and they are thus well suited to the increasingly scarce time of researchers.Yet, despite its centrality in the organisation of academic life, researchers' time has been surprisingly neglected in STS.Ulrike Felt's new, open access book offers an essential (and timely) contribution to STS debates on the role of temporalities in academic research.Moving beyond accounts focused on the acceleration of academic work, and those displaying nostalgic imaginaries of slower golden times, Felt demonstrates that researchers inhabit 'epistemic living spaces', a concept emphasising how people perceive the structures in which they work, characterised by multiple and often contradictory temporalities.Time, she argues, should be understood not as linear but as a multilayered configuration of 're-timing' (p.3).To read this review, you will therefore have to synchronise the heterogeneous temporalities you navigate: the institutional time of funding and evaluation for the projects you applied to, the epistemic temporalities inherent to your objects of study, and your subjective experience of anticipation and waiting, which are strongly shaped by your career stage.Felt's book opens with a vivid anecdote of her early STS work at CERN, conducted at a time when

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Technology Studies
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.178381
Primary Topic
Literature and Cultural Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ulrike Felt (2025) Contesting the Chronopolitics of Research

Lucas Brunet, Didier Torny
Science & Technology Studies
Literature and Cultural Memory
article

Ulrike Felt (2025) Contesting the Chronopolitics of Research

Lucas Brunet, Didier Torny
article en

Abstract

How long will you need to read this review?Book reviews are much quicker to ingest than books themselves and they are thus well suited to the increasingly scarce time of researchers.Yet, despite its centrality in the organisation of academic life, researchers' time has been surprisingly neglected in STS.Ulrike Felt's new, open access book offers an essential (and timely) contribution to STS debates on the role of temporalities in academic research.Moving beyond accounts focused on the acceleration of academic work, and those displaying nostalgic imaginaries of slower golden times, Felt demonstrates that researchers inhabit 'epistemic living spaces', a concept emphasising how people perceive the structures in which they work, characterised by multiple and often contradictory temporalities.Time, she argues, should be understood not as linear but as a multilayered configuration of 're-timing' (p.3).To read this review, you will therefore have to synchronise the heterogeneous temporalities you navigate: the institutional time of funding and evaluation for the projects you applied to, the epistemic temporalities inherent to your objects of study, and your subjective experience of anticipation and waiting, which are strongly shaped by your career stage.Felt's book opens with a vivid anecdote of her early STS work at CERN, conducted at a time when

Science & Technology StudiesVol. 39(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre de sociologie de l'innovation (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Literature and Cultural Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ulrike Felt (2025) Contesting the Chronopolitics of Research — Lucas Brunet, Didier Torny · Science & Technology Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS