Assessment of Freshwater Unionidae Using Environmental DNA Metabarcoding in Lentic Ecosystems: Implications for Spatial Sampling Strategies

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become a powerful, non-invasive method for detecting aquatic organisms. However, optimal sampling strategies for benthic taxa in lentic ecosystems remain unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness of eDNA metabarcoding in detecting freshwater Unionidae mussels in lake water columns and examined their spatial and seasonal distribution patterns. We validated a mini-barcode primer targeting the mitochondrial 16S rDNA of unionid mussels through controlled laboratory experiments and field tests, confirming reliable amplification and accurate taxonomic assignment of freshwater bivalve DNA. Field surveys were conducted in four lakes within the Nakdong River basin, where eDNA samples were collected from littoral zones and from surface, mid-, and bottom layers of central lake areas during autumn and winter. Metabarcoding analysis identified 79 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) representing four unionid taxa, with <i>Cristaria plicata</i> and <i>Sinanodonta lauta</i> comprising the majority of reads and ASVs. Overall, the number of Unionidae eDNA reads showed no significant seasonal differences, but there was notable spatial variation among sampling locations. Read numbers were significantly lower in littoral zones compared to central lake areas, with no significant differences detected among depth layers within the central zones. Species-specific analyses revealed contrasting spatial patterns: <i>C. plicata</i> had higher read abundance in mid- and bottom layers, while <i>S. lauta</i> was more frequently detected in surface and littoral samples. These findings suggest that the distribution of freshwater mussel eDNA in lakes is primarily influenced by spatial factors related to habitat preference and hydrodynamic mixing, rather than by seasonal variation during stable periods. This study offers practical insights for designing effective eDNA sampling strategies for benthic invertebrates in lentic ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology15040338
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Freshwater Unionidae Using Environmental DNA Metabarcoding in Lentic Ecosystems: Implications for Spatial Sampling Strategies

Kyujin Kim, Junhee Kwon, Keonhee Kim, Min-Ho Jang
Biology
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Assessment of Freshwater Unionidae Using Environmental DNA Metabarcoding in Lentic Ecosystems: Implications for Spatial Sampling Strategies

Kyujin Kim, Junhee Kwon, Keonhee Kim, Min-Ho Jang
article en

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become a powerful, non-invasive method for detecting aquatic organisms. However, optimal sampling strategies for benthic taxa in lentic ecosystems remain unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness of eDNA metabarcoding in detecting freshwater Unionidae mussels in lake water columns and examined their spatial and seasonal distribution patterns. We validated a mini-barcode primer targeting the mitochondrial 16S rDNA of unionid mussels through controlled laboratory experiments and field tests, confirming reliable amplification and accurate taxonomic assignment of freshwater bivalve DNA. Field surveys were conducted in four lakes within the Nakdong River basin, where eDNA samples were collected from littoral zones and from surface, mid-, and bottom layers of central lake areas during autumn and winter. Metabarcoding analysis identified 79 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) representing four unionid taxa, with <i>Cristaria plicata</i> and <i>Sinanodonta lauta</i> comprising the majority of reads and ASVs. Overall, the number of Unionidae eDNA reads showed no significant seasonal differences, but there was notable spatial variation among sampling locations. Read numbers were significantly lower in littoral zones compared to central lake areas, with no significant differences detected among depth layers within the central zones. Species-specific analyses revealed contrasting spatial patterns: <i>C. plicata</i> had higher read abundance in mid- and bottom layers, while <i>S. lauta</i> was more frequently detected in surface and littoral samples. These findings suggest that the distribution of freshwater mussel eDNA in lakes is primarily influenced by spatial factors related to habitat preference and hydrodynamic mixing, rather than by seasonal variation during stable periods. This study offers practical insights for designing effective eDNA sampling strategies for benthic invertebrates in lentic ecosystems.

BiologyVol. 15(4)
Kongju National University (KR), Konkuk University (KR), Konkuk University Medical Center (KR)
Kongju National University, Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation of Kyungnam University
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.