Not ‘Super Tax Havens’ After All

When crypto-assets were first introduced, tax experts worried that they might become ‘super tax havens’. With over a decade and a half of hindsight, this article questions whether this tax-enforcement doomsday scenario has materialized or may yet materialize. The article’s conclusion is that the answer is ‘no’. To be sure, crypto-assets are an instrument of tax evasion, but they are not better (and maybe even worse) at facilitating tax evasion than traditional tools such as cash or secrecy jurisdictions. With some adjustments, traditional, time-tested mechanisms of tax enforcement can address tax evasion with cryptocurrencies at least as effectively as addressing any other form of tax evasion. The reason for this is rather simple: contrary to initial hopes (or warnings, depending on one’s perspective), the crypto-assets markets are not disintermediated, not decentralized, and not anonymous, and they are unlikely to become any of those things. If governments chose not to enforce tax laws in the context of crypto-assets, this would be a policy choice, not an inevitability attributable to the nature of blockchain technology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Intertax
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2026027
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not ‘Super Tax Havens’ After All

Omri Marian
Intertax
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Not ‘Super Tax Havens’ After All

Omri Marian
article en

Abstract

When crypto-assets were first introduced, tax experts worried that they might become ‘super tax havens’. With over a decade and a half of hindsight, this article questions whether this tax-enforcement doomsday scenario has materialized or may yet materialize. The article’s conclusion is that the answer is ‘no’. To be sure, crypto-assets are an instrument of tax evasion, but they are not better (and maybe even worse) at facilitating tax evasion than traditional tools such as cash or secrecy jurisdictions. With some adjustments, traditional, time-tested mechanisms of tax enforcement can address tax evasion with cryptocurrencies at least as effectively as addressing any other form of tax evasion. The reason for this is rather simple: contrary to initial hopes (or warnings, depending on one’s perspective), the crypto-assets markets are not disintermediated, not decentralized, and not anonymous, and they are unlikely to become any of those things. If governments chose not to enforce tax laws in the context of crypto-assets, this would be a policy choice, not an inevitability attributable to the nature of blockchain technology.

IntertaxVol. 54(Issue 3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.