Who Cares? For Whom? How the Ethics of Care Might Inform Boardroom Governance, and Beyond

Abstract A persistent problem in corporate governance is the defining scope of the fiduciary and other duties of directors of public corporations, private companies, and other organisations that adopt a corporate form. Moreover, over the past three decades, public policy initiatives have sought to foster greater director accountability not just as a solution to the agency problem but also in aid of broader social goals. This push-and-pull of policy can confuse decision-making and for directors pose a version of the famous “trolley problem” in ethics, with the added complication that boards must decide on how to act collectively and not as individuals. This conceptual paper poses the question: Might the ethics of care – sometimes labelled “feminist ethics” – come to the rescue?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Management
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-025-00365-z
Primary Topic
Business Law and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Cares? For Whom? How the Ethics of Care Might Inform Boardroom Governance, and Beyond

Donald Nordberg
Philosophy of Management
Business Law and Ethics
article

Who Cares? For Whom? How the Ethics of Care Might Inform Boardroom Governance, and Beyond

Donald Nordberg
article en

Abstract

Abstract A persistent problem in corporate governance is the defining scope of the fiduciary and other duties of directors of public corporations, private companies, and other organisations that adopt a corporate form. Moreover, over the past three decades, public policy initiatives have sought to foster greater director accountability not just as a solution to the agency problem but also in aid of broader social goals. This push-and-pull of policy can confuse decision-making and for directors pose a version of the famous “trolley problem” in ethics, with the added complication that boards must decide on how to act collectively and not as individuals. This conceptual paper poses the question: Might the ethics of care – sometimes labelled “feminist ethics” – come to the rescue?

Philosophy of Management
Bournemouth University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Business Law and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.