An Overview of Australian Podiatry Research: A Bibliometric Review
Australian podiatry-relevant research has grown substantially, particularly over the past 2 decades. However, significant disparities exist in volume, evidence quality and funding across different streams, with most research conducted without external funding support, highlighting the need for strategic investment to enhance evidence generation in key areas of podiatry practice.
Authors
- Saraid E. Martin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1049-3852)
- John R. Osborne
- Peta Ellen Tehan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-3023)
- Cylie Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-9141)
- Dean J Samaras
- Benjamin Peterson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5301-4674)
- Helen Banwell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-1611)
- Michelle Kaminski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1133-4853)
- Sheree E. Hurn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-6597)
- Matthew Carroll (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-0539)
- Ameer Nor Azhar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1812-6617)
- Fiona Hawke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-8701)
- Menz
- James Charles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-830X)
- Malia Ho
- Shan M. Bergin
- Polly Lim
Institutions
- Griffith University (AU)
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
- Monash Health (AU)
- Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia (AU)
- Melbourne Health (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Central Queensland University (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
- Published
- 2026-02-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70113
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 28.09
Funders
- Australian Podiatry Association