Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of four myopia control interventions in children: a single-center retrospective study

To compare the one-year clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of single vision lenses (SVL), Myopia-control spectacle lenses (MCSL), Orthokeratology (Ortho-K), and Repeated Low-Level Red-Light (RLRL) therapy in children within a real-world setting. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 206 myopic children aged 8-14 years, who had already received one of four myopia control interventions: SVL (n = 50), MCSL (n = 60), Ortho-K (n = 44), or RLRL (n = 52). The primary outcomes were the change in axial length (AL) and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) after one year of intervention. The secondary outcome was the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), calculated as the additional cost per 0.1 mm of AL elongation saved compared to the SVL group. All active interventions significantly outperformed SVL in controlling AL elongation (SVL mean: 0.42 mm/year). RLRL exhibited the greatest efficacy (mean AL change: 0.06 mm; 86.0% relative to SVL), with 31% of participants showing axial shortening. Ortho-K (0.18 mm; 57.5% efficacy) and MCSL (0.23 mm; 45.2% efficacy) also demonstrated substantial benefits. Mean annual direct medical costs were $140.93 (SVL), $429.44 (MCSL), $1,108.08 (Ortho-K), and $806.29 (RLRL). ICER analysis identified MCSL as the most cost-effective active intervention ($151.69 per 0.1 mm AL saved), followed by RLRL ($184.13), while Ortho-K yielded the highest ICER ($400.42). In this one-year study, RLRL therapy was observed to have the highest efficacy. However, the finding of axial shortening warrants validation in long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to elucidate its mechanism and long-term safety. MCSL spectacle lenses were identified as the most cost-effective option, representing a well-balanced profile of efficacy and economic feasibility. Ortho-K, while a highly effective intervention, was associated with a greater financial burden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40199-x
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of four myopia control interventions in children: a single-center retrospective study

Kai Jin, Carla Lanca, Daohuan Kang, Lu Yuan et al.
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of four myopia control interventions in children: a single-center retrospective study

Kai Jin, Carla Lanca, Daohuan Kang, Lu Yuan, Andrzej Grzybowski, Jia Feng
article en

Abstract

To compare the one-year clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of single vision lenses (SVL), Myopia-control spectacle lenses (MCSL), Orthokeratology (Ortho-K), and Repeated Low-Level Red-Light (RLRL) therapy in children within a real-world setting. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed data from 206 myopic children aged 8-14 years, who had already received one of four myopia control interventions: SVL (n = 50), MCSL (n = 60), Ortho-K (n = 44), or RLRL (n = 52). The primary outcomes were the change in axial length (AL) and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) after one year of intervention. The secondary outcome was the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), calculated as the additional cost per 0.1 mm of AL elongation saved compared to the SVL group. All active interventions significantly outperformed SVL in controlling AL elongation (SVL mean: 0.42 mm/year). RLRL exhibited the greatest efficacy (mean AL change: 0.06 mm; 86.0% relative to SVL), with 31% of participants showing axial shortening. Ortho-K (0.18 mm; 57.5% efficacy) and MCSL (0.23 mm; 45.2% efficacy) also demonstrated substantial benefits. Mean annual direct medical costs were $140.93 (SVL), $429.44 (MCSL), $1,108.08 (Ortho-K), and $806.29 (RLRL). ICER analysis identified MCSL as the most cost-effective active intervention ($151.69 per 0.1 mm AL saved), followed by RLRL ($184.13), while Ortho-K yielded the highest ICER ($400.42). In this one-year study, RLRL therapy was observed to have the highest efficacy. However, the finding of axial shortening warrants validation in long-term randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to elucidate its mechanism and long-term safety. MCSL spectacle lenses were identified as the most cost-effective option, representing a well-balanced profile of efficacy and economic feasibility. Ortho-K, while a highly effective intervention, was associated with a greater financial burden.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), Zhejiang Technical Institute of Economics (CN), Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Foundation for Cardiac Surgery (BE), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.