Nitrosamine Ames Data Review and Method Development: proceedings of a US FDA/HESI workshop

Detection of N-nitrosamine (NA) in pharmaceuticals became a point of interest due to the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of some compounds of this class, and their identification as nitrosated forms of marketed drugs, otherwise known as NA Drug Substance-Related Impurities (NDSRIs). The Ames test is used to assess the mutagenic potential of drug impurities, including NAs. Concerns over the sensitivity of the Ames test, as recommended in OECD Test Guideline 471, in predicting the rodent carcinogenic potential of NAs has prompted optimization of several test parameters used for detecting the mutagenicity of NAs (e.g., methods used for metabolic activation and the selection of tester strains). In order to discuss optimal Ames test conditions for the evaluation of NAs, including NDSRIs, the Office of New Drugs (OND) in the US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US FDA/CDER) and the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee (HESI/GTTC) co-organized and co-sponsored a workshop entitled "Nitrosamines: Ames Data Review and Method Development Workshop". The workshop featured five sessions addressing charge questions pertinent to the Ames test conditions and performance through the presentation of data and panel discussions. This report outlines the key takeaway points from the workshop.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mutagenesis
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geag011
Primary Topic
Water Treatment and Disinfection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nitrosamine Ames Data Review and Method Development: proceedings of a US FDA/HESI workshop

Aisar H. Atrakchi, Max Selby, Rhys Whomsley, Tetyana Kobets et al.
Mutagenesis
Water Treatment and Disinfection
article

Nitrosamine Ames Data Review and Method Development: proceedings of a US FDA/HESI workshop

Aisar H. Atrakchi, Max Selby, Rhys Whomsley, Tetyana Kobets, Alisa Vespa, Joel P. Bercu, Andreas Czich, Jennifer Cheung, Timothy J. McGovern, Karen Davis‐Bruno, Anthony M. Lynch, Raechel Puglisi, Roland Froestchl, Connie L Chen, Maik Schuler, Robert H Heflich, Gabriela De Oliveira Silveira
article en

Abstract

Detection of N-nitrosamine (NA) in pharmaceuticals became a point of interest due to the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of some compounds of this class, and their identification as nitrosated forms of marketed drugs, otherwise known as NA Drug Substance-Related Impurities (NDSRIs). The Ames test is used to assess the mutagenic potential of drug impurities, including NAs. Concerns over the sensitivity of the Ames test, as recommended in OECD Test Guideline 471, in predicting the rodent carcinogenic potential of NAs has prompted optimization of several test parameters used for detecting the mutagenicity of NAs (e.g., methods used for metabolic activation and the selection of tester strains). In order to discuss optimal Ames test conditions for the evaluation of NAs, including NDSRIs, the Office of New Drugs (OND) in the US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US FDA/CDER) and the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's Genetic Toxicology Technical Committee (HESI/GTTC) co-organized and co-sponsored a workshop entitled "Nitrosamines: Ames Data Review and Method Development Workshop". The workshop featured five sessions addressing charge questions pertinent to the Ames test conditions and performance through the presentation of data and panel discussions. This report outlines the key takeaway points from the workshop.

Mutagenesis
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (DE), Health Canada (CA), European Medicines Agency (NL), National Center for Toxicological Research (US), University of Leeds (GB), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), New York Medical College (US), Age UK (GB), Sanofi (France) (FR), Oaks Hospital (GB), Gilead Sciences (United States) (US), Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Water Treatment and Disinfection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.