Patient advocacy group perspectives on treatment priorities and clinical trials for the rare neurodevelopmental condition, Prader-Willi syndrome

Using Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) as an example, this position statement focuses on supporting the development and evaluation of new treatments for rare neurodevelopmental disorders. As members of two patient advocacy organisations we have drawn on published research and the experience of participants, parents, paid care providers, and clinicians to make recommendations to improve the translational process from drug discovery to treatment approval and availability. PWS is a rare complex genetically-determined neurodevelopmental condition. Severe hypotonia and failure to thrive are apparent at birth, followed by an atypical pattern of development associated with variable but characteristic physical and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Like other neurodevelopmental conditions, atypical brain development results in intellectual and cognitive impairments. Relative growth and sex hormone deficiencies, the onset of hyperphagia in early childhood, and other phenotypic characteristics are a consequence of impaired hypothalamic function. Although growth hormone treatment for children with PWS has improved the phenotype of PWS, treatments for other features of the disorder are needed given their severe impact on the lives of people with PWS and their families. We identified factors that have delayed the development and evaluation of new treatments including: a limited understanding of causal mechanisms; additional measures required due to the participants’ intellectual and cognitive impairments potentially impacting on consent, compliance, and requiring informant rather than participant-based outcome measures; high risk for co-morbidities; and recruitment from a small population; and over-restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria. Clinical trials can be performed in PWS but the associated complexities requires an understanding of the challenges and a more flexible approach to recruitment and trial design. The identification of biomarkers to screen new agents and for prediction of efficacy and outcome are warranted. Novel statistical methods for small numbers and/or qualitative methodologies, may be necessary and appropriate. Robust and meaningful engagement of those living with PWS and their families, advocacy groups and expert clinicians is critical to the successful clinical trial completion. Given the example of the variable availability and affordability internationally of growth hormone to people with PWS, we express concern about the availability of new treatments globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04253-1
Primary Topic
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient advocacy group perspectives on treatment priorities and clinical trials for the rare neurodevelopmental condition, Prader-Willi syndrome

Theresa V. Strong, M. Tauber, M. Hughes, Lauren Schwartz et al.
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
article

Patient advocacy group perspectives on treatment priorities and clinical trials for the rare neurodevelopmental condition, Prader-Willi syndrome

Theresa V. Strong, M. Tauber, M. Hughes, Lauren Schwartz, Charlotte Höybye, Lynn Garrick, Anthony Holland
article en

Abstract

Using Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) as an example, this position statement focuses on supporting the development and evaluation of new treatments for rare neurodevelopmental disorders. As members of two patient advocacy organisations we have drawn on published research and the experience of participants, parents, paid care providers, and clinicians to make recommendations to improve the translational process from drug discovery to treatment approval and availability. PWS is a rare complex genetically-determined neurodevelopmental condition. Severe hypotonia and failure to thrive are apparent at birth, followed by an atypical pattern of development associated with variable but characteristic physical and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Like other neurodevelopmental conditions, atypical brain development results in intellectual and cognitive impairments. Relative growth and sex hormone deficiencies, the onset of hyperphagia in early childhood, and other phenotypic characteristics are a consequence of impaired hypothalamic function. Although growth hormone treatment for children with PWS has improved the phenotype of PWS, treatments for other features of the disorder are needed given their severe impact on the lives of people with PWS and their families. We identified factors that have delayed the development and evaluation of new treatments including: a limited understanding of causal mechanisms; additional measures required due to the participants’ intellectual and cognitive impairments potentially impacting on consent, compliance, and requiring informant rather than participant-based outcome measures; high risk for co-morbidities; and recruitment from a small population; and over-restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria. Clinical trials can be performed in PWS but the associated complexities requires an understanding of the challenges and a more flexible approach to recruitment and trial design. The identification of biomarkers to screen new agents and for prediction of efficacy and outcome are warranted. Novel statistical methods for small numbers and/or qualitative methodologies, may be necessary and appropriate. Robust and meaningful engagement of those living with PWS and their families, advocacy groups and expert clinicians is critical to the successful clinical trial completion. Given the example of the variable availability and affordability internationally of growth hormone to people with PWS, we express concern about the availability of new treatments globally.

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), University of Cambridge (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Advisory Board Company (United States) (US), MED Institute (US), Orthopaedic Research Foundation (US), Foundation for Prader-Willi Research (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.