Judicial Interest Rates: Strategic Considerations

Abstract The appropriate method for determining the judicial interest rate remains unsettled. This article contributes to the debate by presenting a model that accounts for the complexities of party incentives and strategic delays in litigation. Additionally, we provide a rational explanation for the widespread use of a party-independent interest rate in many jurisdictions. When a single judicial interest rate is applied uniformly to all litigants, the optimal rate for minimizing delays can be understood as the average market interest rate, provided that the discount rates of plaintiffs and defendants are independently and identically distributed according to a symmetric distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Law and Economics Review
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahaf017
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Judicial Interest Rates: Strategic Considerations

Yijia Lu, Nuno Garoupa
American Law and Economics Review
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Judicial Interest Rates: Strategic Considerations

Yijia Lu, Nuno Garoupa
article en

Abstract

Abstract The appropriate method for determining the judicial interest rate remains unsettled. This article contributes to the debate by presenting a model that accounts for the complexities of party incentives and strategic delays in litigation. Additionally, we provide a rational explanation for the widespread use of a party-independent interest rate in many jurisdictions. When a single judicial interest rate is applied uniformly to all litigants, the optimal rate for minimizing delays can be understood as the average market interest rate, provided that the discount rates of plaintiffs and defendants are independently and identically distributed according to a symmetric distribution.

American Law and Economics Review
George Mason University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Judicial Interest Rates: Strategic Considerations — Yijia Lu, Nuno Garoupa · American Law and Economics Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS