Spatial Imbalance and Driving Mechanisms of Human–Environment Coupling in the Xiuhe River Basin: Implications for Coordinated Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscape

This study examines the spatial imbalance and driving mechanisms of human–environment coupling in the Xiuhe River Basin, an important agricultural–ecological watershed in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. We integrated the coupling-coordination degree (C–D) model, Coupling Elasticity Index (CEI), spatial autocorrelation analyses (global and local Moran’s I, LISA, and Getis–Ord Gi*), and GeoDetector to assess spatial heterogeneity, classify coupling types, and identify key human–ecosystem. The results reveal marked spatial variation in coordination levels, which are higher in the central–western mountains and lower in the southeastern plains (global Moran’s I = 0.7344, p < 0.01), indicating significant spatial clustering. Using the CEI, the basin was classified into ecology-dominated zones (ecological advancement with human retreat), human-dominated zones (human advancement with ecological retreat), and relatively balanced zones. Upstream areas (CEI < 0.6) exhibit ecological advantages, whereas downstream plains (CEI > 1.5) experience dominant human pressures. GeoDetector analysis identified population density, proportion of built-up land, and water quality indicators (COD and TP) as the primary drivers, with interactions substantially enhancing explanatory power (e.g., PD × COD q = 0.86). These findings underscore nonlinear feedbacks and cross-scale interactions that influence coordinated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. We recommend differentiated management strategies: conserving upstream ecological functions, promoting balanced development in midstream areas, and regulating development intensity and pollution downstream to sustain human–environment coordination. This study provides quantitative evidence and methodological insights to improve understanding of ecological complexity and optimize governance of the agricultural landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020326
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Imbalance and Driving Mechanisms of Human–Environment Coupling in the Xiuhe River Basin: Implications for Coordinated Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscape

Weiqi Min, Junwei Wu, Ligang Xu, Dongping Zha et al.
1 citations
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
36.62
article

Spatial Imbalance and Driving Mechanisms of Human–Environment Coupling in the Xiuhe River Basin: Implications for Coordinated Ecosystem Services in Agricultural Landscape

Weiqi Min, Junwei Wu, Ligang Xu, Dongping Zha, Meng Zhang, Nan Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the spatial imbalance and driving mechanisms of human–environment coupling in the Xiuhe River Basin, an important agricultural–ecological watershed in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. We integrated the coupling-coordination degree (C–D) model, Coupling Elasticity Index (CEI), spatial autocorrelation analyses (global and local Moran’s I, LISA, and Getis–Ord Gi*), and GeoDetector to assess spatial heterogeneity, classify coupling types, and identify key human–ecosystem. The results reveal marked spatial variation in coordination levels, which are higher in the central–western mountains and lower in the southeastern plains (global Moran’s I = 0.7344, p < 0.01), indicating significant spatial clustering. Using the CEI, the basin was classified into ecology-dominated zones (ecological advancement with human retreat), human-dominated zones (human advancement with ecological retreat), and relatively balanced zones. Upstream areas (CEI < 0.6) exhibit ecological advantages, whereas downstream plains (CEI > 1.5) experience dominant human pressures. GeoDetector analysis identified population density, proportion of built-up land, and water quality indicators (COD and TP) as the primary drivers, with interactions substantially enhancing explanatory power (e.g., PD × COD q = 0.86). These findings underscore nonlinear feedbacks and cross-scale interactions that influence coordinated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. We recommend differentiated management strategies: conserving upstream ecological functions, promoting balanced development in midstream areas, and regulating development intensity and pollution downstream to sustain human–environment coordination. This study provides quantitative evidence and methodological insights to improve understanding of ecological complexity and optimize governance of the agricultural landscape.

LandVol. 15(2)
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Water Sciences (CN), Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology (CN), Jiangxi Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
36.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.