Rethinking organic efficiency: A dynamic analysis of resource trade-offs in Italian agriculture through the FWEE nexus

• This paper provides the first systematic, causal farm-level evaluation of organic conversion through the Food–Water–Energy–Environment (FWEE) nexus using 53,804 Italian FADN crop-farm observations (2015–2022) and a dynamic DiD estimator suited to reversible adoption. • The nexus results show a clear Food–Energy trade-off: total energy intensity per euro of adjusted output increases by about 1.229 pp overall, with larger and more persistent penalties in permanent crops (about 2.118 pp) than in field crops/horticulture (about 1.235 pp). • Food–Water and Water–Energy interactions are highly transition-dependent, with early irrigation burdens per adjusted output and later increases in water-per-energy ratios, indicating tighter water–energy coupling when output dips during conversion. • Environmental gains are not automatic: biodiversity and nitrogen proxies show no consistent improvements, while crop-protection burdens per output (and per water) often rise, yielding mixed/negative outcomes in the Food–Environment and Water–Environment links. • The conclusions stress that EU organic targets require system-specific, nexus-aware support (technology integration and concentrated help in early transition years), and the paper fills key gaps by moving beyond single-indicator/static/pilot or theoretical studies with real nationwide multi-crop data, explicit system heterogeneity, and dynamic conversion-phase impacts. This paper evaluates whether converting to organic farming delivers resource efficiency once cross-domain trade-offs are measured within the Food–Water–Energy–Environment (FWEE) nexus framework. Using 53,804 Italian crop-farm observations (2015–2022) from FADN, the analysis applies a dynamic difference-in-differences estimator for reversible conversion. Findings show that total energy intensity per euro of adjusted output rises overall, with pronounced and persistent penalties in permanent crops and volatile, only partly reversing spikes in annuals. Irrigation burdens per adjusted output increase during conversion, evidencing tighter water-energy coupling under yield dips. Environmental gains are non-automatic: biodiversity and nitrogen proxies show no consistent improvements, while crop-protection burdens per output often rise. Results imply nexus-aware, system-specific technical support, technology integration,conversion payment mechanisms, and moving beyond input reduction alone to address system heterogeneity, yield gaps, and momentaryinefficiencies through coordinated soil-water-energy management strategies to convert temporary trade-offs into durable synergies for Farm-to-Fork implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.108853
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking organic efficiency: A dynamic analysis of resource trade-offs in Italian agriculture through the FWEE nexus

Luigi Biagini, Simone Severini, Federico Antonioli
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
article

Rethinking organic efficiency: A dynamic analysis of resource trade-offs in Italian agriculture through the FWEE nexus

Luigi Biagini, Simone Severini, Federico Antonioli
article en

Abstract

• This paper provides the first systematic, causal farm-level evaluation of organic conversion through the Food–Water–Energy–Environment (FWEE) nexus using 53,804 Italian FADN crop-farm observations (2015–2022) and a dynamic DiD estimator suited to reversible adoption. • The nexus results show a clear Food–Energy trade-off: total energy intensity per euro of adjusted output increases by about 1.229 pp overall, with larger and more persistent penalties in permanent crops (about 2.118 pp) than in field crops/horticulture (about 1.235 pp). • Food–Water and Water–Energy interactions are highly transition-dependent, with early irrigation burdens per adjusted output and later increases in water-per-energy ratios, indicating tighter water–energy coupling when output dips during conversion. • Environmental gains are not automatic: biodiversity and nitrogen proxies show no consistent improvements, while crop-protection burdens per output (and per water) often rise, yielding mixed/negative outcomes in the Food–Environment and Water–Environment links. • The conclusions stress that EU organic targets require system-specific, nexus-aware support (technology integration and concentrated help in early transition years), and the paper fills key gaps by moving beyond single-indicator/static/pilot or theoretical studies with real nationwide multi-crop data, explicit system heterogeneity, and dynamic conversion-phase impacts. This paper evaluates whether converting to organic farming delivers resource efficiency once cross-domain trade-offs are measured within the Food–Water–Energy–Environment (FWEE) nexus framework. Using 53,804 Italian crop-farm observations (2015–2022) from FADN, the analysis applies a dynamic difference-in-differences estimator for reversible conversion. Findings show that total energy intensity per euro of adjusted output rises overall, with pronounced and persistent penalties in permanent crops and volatile, only partly reversing spikes in annuals. Irrigation burdens per adjusted output increase during conversion, evidencing tighter water-energy coupling under yield dips. Environmental gains are non-automatic: biodiversity and nitrogen proxies show no consistent improvements, while crop-protection burdens per output often rise. Results imply nexus-aware, system-specific technical support, technology integration,conversion payment mechanisms, and moving beyond input reduction alone to address system heterogeneity, yield gaps, and momentaryinefficiencies through coordinated soil-water-energy management strategies to convert temporary trade-offs into durable synergies for Farm-to-Fork implementation.

Resources Conservation and RecyclingVol. 229
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), European Commission (BE), Joint Research Center (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.