A Conceptual Framework for Critically Evaluating Integration of AI Diagnostic Support Systems into Clinical Practice

Abstract In our first section, we make the prior engagement between artificial intelligence (AI) and medicine explicit and show how pervasively AI (broadly conceived) has already influenced and been integrated into medicine and clinical care. There has been ethical reflection on these developments since the early 1960s, and many of the concerns articulated today (about impact on the physician-patient relation, explainability, bias and so on) have already been considered in some form long ago. In our second section, we briefly consider ML and what may be distinctive about diagnostic support systems utilizing ML. We also consider in very broad strokes some of the ethical challenges and technical tools offered within AI for addressing these challenges. Within this broader horizon, we consider in our third section the contributions made by the essays in the issue. We close with some summary thoughts on how reading these essays together sharpens our appreciation of ongoing ethical challenges for integrating diagnostic support systems into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf019
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Conceptual Framework for Critically Evaluating Integration of AI Diagnostic Support Systems into Clinical Practice

Ana S. Iltis, George Khushf
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

A Conceptual Framework for Critically Evaluating Integration of AI Diagnostic Support Systems into Clinical Practice

Ana S. Iltis, George Khushf
article en

Abstract

Abstract In our first section, we make the prior engagement between artificial intelligence (AI) and medicine explicit and show how pervasively AI (broadly conceived) has already influenced and been integrated into medicine and clinical care. There has been ethical reflection on these developments since the early 1960s, and many of the concerns articulated today (about impact on the physician-patient relation, explainability, bias and so on) have already been considered in some form long ago. In our second section, we briefly consider ML and what may be distinctive about diagnostic support systems utilizing ML. We also consider in very broad strokes some of the ethical challenges and technical tools offered within AI for addressing these challenges. Within this broader horizon, we consider in our third section the contributions made by the essays in the issue. We close with some summary thoughts on how reading these essays together sharpens our appreciation of ongoing ethical challenges for integrating diagnostic support systems into clinical practice.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineVol. 50(6)
University of South Carolina (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Conceptual Framework for Critically Evaluating Integration of AI Diagnostic Support Systems into Clinical Practice — Ana S. Iltis, George Khushf · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS