Coherent Disaggregation and Uncertainty Quantification for Spatially Misaligned Data

ABSTRACT Spatial misalignment arises when datasets are aggregated or collected at different spatial scales, leading to information loss. We develop a Bayesian disaggregation framework that links misaligned data to a continuous‐domain model through an iteratively linearised integration scheme implemented with the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA). The framework accommodates different ways of handling observations depending on the application, resulting in four variants: (i) Raster at Full Resolution , (ii) Raster Aggregation , (iii) Polygon Aggregation (PolyAgg), and (iv) Point Values (PointVal). The first three represent increasing levels of spatial averaging, while the last two address situations with incomplete covariate information. For PolyAgg and PointVal, we reconstruct the covariate field using three strategies— Value Plugin , Joint Uncertainty , and Uncertainty Plugin —with the latter two propagating uncertainty. We illustrate the framework with an example motivated by landslide modelling, focusing on methodology rather than interpreting landslide processes. Simulations show that uncertainty‐propagating approaches outperform Value Plugin method and remain robust under model misspecification. Point‐pattern observations and full‐resolution covariates are therefore preferable, and when covariate fields are incomplete, uncertainty‐aware methods are most reliable. The framework is well suited to landslide susceptibility modelling and other spatial mapping tasks, and integrates seamlessly with INLA‐based tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmetrics
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/env.70078
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coherent Disaggregation and Uncertainty Quantification for Spatially Misaligned Data

Mark F. Naylor, Man Ho Suen, Finn Lindgren
Environmetrics
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Coherent Disaggregation and Uncertainty Quantification for Spatially Misaligned Data

Mark F. Naylor, Man Ho Suen, Finn Lindgren
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Spatial misalignment arises when datasets are aggregated or collected at different spatial scales, leading to information loss. We develop a Bayesian disaggregation framework that links misaligned data to a continuous‐domain model through an iteratively linearised integration scheme implemented with the Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA). The framework accommodates different ways of handling observations depending on the application, resulting in four variants: (i) Raster at Full Resolution , (ii) Raster Aggregation , (iii) Polygon Aggregation (PolyAgg), and (iv) Point Values (PointVal). The first three represent increasing levels of spatial averaging, while the last two address situations with incomplete covariate information. For PolyAgg and PointVal, we reconstruct the covariate field using three strategies— Value Plugin , Joint Uncertainty , and Uncertainty Plugin —with the latter two propagating uncertainty. We illustrate the framework with an example motivated by landslide modelling, focusing on methodology rather than interpreting landslide processes. Simulations show that uncertainty‐propagating approaches outperform Value Plugin method and remain robust under model misspecification. Point‐pattern observations and full‐resolution covariates are therefore preferable, and when covariate fields are incomplete, uncertainty‐aware methods are most reliable. The framework is well suited to landslide susceptibility modelling and other spatial mapping tasks, and integrates seamlessly with INLA‐based tools.

EnvironmetricsVol. 37(2)
Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.