Comparative Study between Surgical Management and Venoplasty with Stenting in Cases of Recurrent Venous Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patient.

Background: Recurrent venous hypertension due to central venous stenosis or occlusion is a common complication in hemodialysis patients, often resulting from previous central venous catheterization. Endovascular treatments like balloon angioplasty and stenting offer initial relief but suffer from high recurrence rates, while surgical interventions provide alternative solutions when endovascular therapy fails. Objective: to compare short-term outcomes between venoplasty with stenting and surgical management in recurrent venous hypertension secondary to central venous occlusion among hemodialysis patients. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized trial was conducted on 40 patients with recurrent venous hypertension, assigned to receive either endovascular stenting or surgical bypass. Clinical and imaging assessments were performed, with patency and symptom resolution evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: Postoperative arm circumference showed a significantly greater reduction in the surgical group (P=0.003), with both groups having significant within-group decreases (P<0.001) and no baseline differences (P=0.390). Similarly, forearm circumference reduction was significantly greater in the surgical group (P<0.001), with significant decreases in both groups post-intervention (P<0.001) and comparable preoperative measurements (P=0.201). Intraoperative venography findings differed significantly between groups (P=0.004), indicating more severe lesions in the surgical group, Procedure duration was significantly longer in the surgical group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Surgical venous drainage provided superior primary patency and more effective early resolution of limb swelling compared to venoplas ty with stenting, despite longer operative time. Both interventions are effective in maintaining dialysis access, however venoplasty is safer compared to surgical venous drainage which is associated with higher 30-days mortality rate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18638091
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study between Surgical Management and Venoplasty with Stenting in Cases of Recurrent Venous Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patient.

Moataz Ashraf Saleh, Abdelrahman Magdi Ahmad, Ayman Abdelfattah Mohamed, Mohamed Abdelsalam Rizk et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Comparative Study between Surgical Management and Venoplasty with Stenting in Cases of Recurrent Venous Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patient.

Moataz Ashraf Saleh, Abdelrahman Magdi Ahmad, Ayman Abdelfattah Mohamed, Mohamed Abdelsalam Rizk, Mohamed Ismail Mohamed, Yasser Mohamed Elsayed Rezk Barakat
article en

Abstract

Background: Recurrent venous hypertension due to central venous stenosis or occlusion is a common complication in hemodialysis patients, often resulting from previous central venous catheterization. Endovascular treatments like balloon angioplasty and stenting offer initial relief but suffer from high recurrence rates, while surgical interventions provide alternative solutions when endovascular therapy fails. Objective: to compare short-term outcomes between venoplasty with stenting and surgical management in recurrent venous hypertension secondary to central venous occlusion among hemodialysis patients. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized trial was conducted on 40 patients with recurrent venous hypertension, assigned to receive either endovascular stenting or surgical bypass. Clinical and imaging assessments were performed, with patency and symptom resolution evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: Postoperative arm circumference showed a significantly greater reduction in the surgical group (P=0.003), with both groups having significant within-group decreases (P<0.001) and no baseline differences (P=0.390). Similarly, forearm circumference reduction was significantly greater in the surgical group (P<0.001), with significant decreases in both groups post-intervention (P<0.001) and comparable preoperative measurements (P=0.201). Intraoperative venography findings differed significantly between groups (P=0.004), indicating more severe lesions in the surgical group, Procedure duration was significantly longer in the surgical group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Surgical venous drainage provided superior primary patency and more effective early resolution of limb swelling compared to venoplas ty with stenting, despite longer operative time. Both interventions are effective in maintaining dialysis access, however venoplasty is safer compared to surgical venous drainage which is associated with higher 30-days mortality rate.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.