Co-Agency of AI, A Literature Review on Theorizing Al as Institutional Actors.

This literature review examines how contemporary scholarship theorizes artificial intelligence as an institutional actor, focusing on whether and how AI systems gain legitimacy, authority, and norm-shaping capacity within organizational and societal fields. Drawing on an AI-assisted discovery and screening workflow, the review identifies 1,093 candidate publications and narrows them to 50 high-relevance papers spanning media and journalism studies, organizational and management research, sociology, law, public governance, and higher education. The synthesis shows broad recognition that algorithms can function institutionally by structuring behavior and decision-making, yet the field remains conceptually fragmented and empirically underdeveloped. Most empirical studies analyze institutional adaptation and governance responses to AI rather than tracing processes through which AI systems themselves become embedded as durable rule-makers. The most promising advances come from sociotechnical and distributed-agency approaches, including actor-network theory and hybrid human–algorithm configurations, but these frameworks often leave ontological questions of “actorhood” unresolved. The review concludes that a mature, evidence-based theory of AI as institutional actors is still lacking, and it outlines priority research directions for empirically studying legitimation, institutionalization indicators, and cross-disciplinary integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18643433
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Agency of AI, A Literature Review on Theorizing Al as Institutional Actors.

Gerin Trautenberger
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Co-Agency of AI, A Literature Review on Theorizing Al as Institutional Actors.

Gerin Trautenberger
article en

Abstract

This literature review examines how contemporary scholarship theorizes artificial intelligence as an institutional actor, focusing on whether and how AI systems gain legitimacy, authority, and norm-shaping capacity within organizational and societal fields. Drawing on an AI-assisted discovery and screening workflow, the review identifies 1,093 candidate publications and narrows them to 50 high-relevance papers spanning media and journalism studies, organizational and management research, sociology, law, public governance, and higher education. The synthesis shows broad recognition that algorithms can function institutionally by structuring behavior and decision-making, yet the field remains conceptually fragmented and empirically underdeveloped. Most empirical studies analyze institutional adaptation and governance responses to AI rather than tracing processes through which AI systems themselves become embedded as durable rule-makers. The most promising advances come from sociotechnical and distributed-agency approaches, including actor-network theory and hybrid human–algorithm configurations, but these frameworks often leave ontological questions of “actorhood” unresolved. The review concludes that a mature, evidence-based theory of AI as institutional actors is still lacking, and it outlines priority research directions for empirically studying legitimation, institutionalization indicators, and cross-disciplinary integration.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Vienna (AT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.