A spatial anthropology perspective on the coupling mechanism between infrastructure and market settlements

In the context of urbanization, traditional settlement spaces face challenges of functional integration and value disparity. This paper employs the theoretical lens of spatial anthropology to examine the interaction between infrastructure and market settlements in modern Dongguan (1840–1949). The analysis considers four perspectives: spatial, functional, societal, and historical. It draws on spatial analysis, digital humanities, and historical archive review. The findings show that interactions depend not only on the natural environment and technological advancements, but also on integration within local power networks and global capital flows. This study aims to move beyond traditional linear causality in urban history. It proposes an analytical framework emphasizing “bidirectional interaction and multi-factor coupling” for studying infrastructure and market settlements. This framework provides a theoretical foundation for heritage conservation and sustainable development of river basins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Heritage Science
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02373-2
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A spatial anthropology perspective on the coupling mechanism between infrastructure and market settlements

Mengyan Jia, Jianqiang Yin
npj Heritage Science
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

A spatial anthropology perspective on the coupling mechanism between infrastructure and market settlements

Mengyan Jia, Jianqiang Yin
article en

Abstract

In the context of urbanization, traditional settlement spaces face challenges of functional integration and value disparity. This paper employs the theoretical lens of spatial anthropology to examine the interaction between infrastructure and market settlements in modern Dongguan (1840–1949). The analysis considers four perspectives: spatial, functional, societal, and historical. It draws on spatial analysis, digital humanities, and historical archive review. The findings show that interactions depend not only on the natural environment and technological advancements, but also on integration within local power networks and global capital flows. This study aims to move beyond traditional linear causality in urban history. It proposes an analytical framework emphasizing “bidirectional interaction and multi-factor coupling” for studying infrastructure and market settlements. This framework provides a theoretical foundation for heritage conservation and sustainable development of river basins.

npj Heritage ScienceVol. 14(1)
Nanjing Forestry University (CN), Jiyang College of Zhejiang A&F University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.