The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities

Inclusive education has emerged as a global priority, emphasizing equitable access, participation, and learning outcomes for learners with disabilities. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have introduced new opportunities to address diverse learner needs through adaptive, personalized, and accessible educational technologies. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the effectiveness of AI- and ML-based interventions for learners with disabilities across educational contexts. Guided by PRISMA 2020 standards, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, identifying 245 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and December 2025. Following duplicate removal, screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 19 studies met all methodological and thematic inclusion criteria and were included in the final thematic narrative synthesis. The review examined types of AI/ML technologies, disability categories (learning, sensory, physical, and psychosocial), educational and inclusion-related outcomes, and ethical and accessibility considerations. The included studies employed quantitative (47.4%), qualitative (31.6%), and mixed-methods (21.0%) designs. AI-driven interventions, such as intelligent tutoring systems, natural language processing applications, assistive technologies, and learning analytics, demonstrated positive effects on academic achievement, accessibility, learner autonomy, engagement, psychosocial outcomes, and social inclusion, with particularly strong evidence for learners with learning and sensory disabilities. However, evidence for institutional-level impact and long-term outcomes remains limited. Key challenges identified include algorithmic bias, data privacy risks, uneven accessibility compliance, and persistent inequities between high-income and low-resource contexts. Overall, the findings indicate that AI and ML can meaningfully support inclusive education when grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and rights-based frameworks. The review underscores the need for more methodologically rigorous, geographically diverse, and longitudinal research to determine which technologies are most effective for specific disability groups and to ensure that AI-enabled education advances inclusion rather than reinforcing existing inequities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Medical Education
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities

Simachew Alamneh, Habtamu Belay
American Journal of Medical Education
Disability Education and Employment
article

The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities

Simachew Alamneh, Habtamu Belay
article en

Abstract

Inclusive education has emerged as a global priority, emphasizing equitable access, participation, and learning outcomes for learners with disabilities. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have introduced new opportunities to address diverse learner needs through adaptive, personalized, and accessible educational technologies. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the effectiveness of AI- and ML-based interventions for learners with disabilities across educational contexts. Guided by PRISMA 2020 standards, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, identifying 245 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and December 2025. Following duplicate removal, screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 19 studies met all methodological and thematic inclusion criteria and were included in the final thematic narrative synthesis. The review examined types of AI/ML technologies, disability categories (learning, sensory, physical, and psychosocial), educational and inclusion-related outcomes, and ethical and accessibility considerations. The included studies employed quantitative (47.4%), qualitative (31.6%), and mixed-methods (21.0%) designs. AI-driven interventions, such as intelligent tutoring systems, natural language processing applications, assistive technologies, and learning analytics, demonstrated positive effects on academic achievement, accessibility, learner autonomy, engagement, psychosocial outcomes, and social inclusion, with particularly strong evidence for learners with learning and sensory disabilities. However, evidence for institutional-level impact and long-term outcomes remains limited. Key challenges identified include algorithmic bias, data privacy risks, uneven accessibility compliance, and persistent inequities between high-income and low-resource contexts. Overall, the findings indicate that AI and ML can meaningfully support inclusive education when grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and rights-based frameworks. The review underscores the need for more methodologically rigorous, geographically diverse, and longitudinal research to determine which technologies are most effective for specific disability groups and to ensure that AI-enabled education advances inclusion rather than reinforcing existing inequities.

American Journal of Medical EducationVol. 2(1)
Bond University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.