Integrated Pest Management Adoption, Pesticide Handling and Knowledge Gaps among Cotton Farmers in Tanzania: Implications for Human and Environmental Health

The global demand for cotton has risen significantly due to its extensive use in the textile and manufacturing industries, making it one of the most valuable cash crops worldwide. However, this growing demand for cotton production is severely threatened by the currently emerging pests which are intensified by the occurring of climate change and variability. As a result, many smallholder farmers have increasingly turned to chemical pesticides use to control the pests and maintain cotton production. But, while pesticides are effective in controlling pests and improving yields, their improper use and mismanagement pose serious risks to human health and the environment. This study was conducted to assess the extent of pesticide dependence among cotton farmers, their awareness of the health and environmental risks associated with pesticide use, and their rate of adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) as a safer alternative for controlling pests. Using embedded design, a one of the types of designs of mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were collected from structured interviews with heads of cotton-farming households, alongside qualitative data from in-depth interview with key informants and focus group discussions (FGDs). The findings revealed that 70% of farmers relied on chemical pesticides for pest control. Only 8% reported using IPM practices. Additionally, 86% and 80% of the respondents lacked knowledge of the potential environmental and health risks of pesticide use, respectively. Moreover, 91% and 75% of the respondents had not received any training on IPM and pesticide handling, respectively. The study concludes that the widespread lack of knowledge about the harmful effects of pesticides was largely due to inadequate training on pesticide use. Furthermore, the low adoption of IPM is linked to insufficient awareness and training. The study recommends implementing targeted training programs to promote safe pesticide use and increase awareness and adoption of IPM for improved human and environmental health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65085/2467-4745.1099
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Pest Management Adoption, Pesticide Handling and Knowledge Gaps among Cotton Farmers in Tanzania: Implications for Human and Environmental Health

Sospeter Jibunge Charles
Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
article

Integrated Pest Management Adoption, Pesticide Handling and Knowledge Gaps among Cotton Farmers in Tanzania: Implications for Human and Environmental Health

Sospeter Jibunge Charles
article en

Abstract

The global demand for cotton has risen significantly due to its extensive use in the textile and manufacturing industries, making it one of the most valuable cash crops worldwide. However, this growing demand for cotton production is severely threatened by the currently emerging pests which are intensified by the occurring of climate change and variability. As a result, many smallholder farmers have increasingly turned to chemical pesticides use to control the pests and maintain cotton production. But, while pesticides are effective in controlling pests and improving yields, their improper use and mismanagement pose serious risks to human health and the environment. This study was conducted to assess the extent of pesticide dependence among cotton farmers, their awareness of the health and environmental risks associated with pesticide use, and their rate of adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) as a safer alternative for controlling pests. Using embedded design, a one of the types of designs of mixed-methods approach, quantitative data were collected from structured interviews with heads of cotton-farming households, alongside qualitative data from in-depth interview with key informants and focus group discussions (FGDs). The findings revealed that 70% of farmers relied on chemical pesticides for pest control. Only 8% reported using IPM practices. Additionally, 86% and 80% of the respondents lacked knowledge of the potential environmental and health risks of pesticide use, respectively. Moreover, 91% and 75% of the respondents had not received any training on IPM and pesticide handling, respectively. The study concludes that the widespread lack of knowledge about the harmful effects of pesticides was largely due to inadequate training on pesticide use. Furthermore, the low adoption of IPM is linked to insufficient awareness and training. The study recommends implementing targeted training programs to promote safe pesticide use and increase awareness and adoption of IPM for improved human and environmental health.

Journal of Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 14(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.