CBCT in Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation—A Scoping Review

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely utilized in endodontics for evaluating root canal shaping outcomes, offering critical three-dimensional imaging capabilities. This study aims to assess the differences in apical and root canal preparation across various instrumentation techniques using CBCT. A systematic search of the Medline database (via PubMed) and Web of Science was performed up to 12 April 2025, yielding a total of 70 studies, with 45 full-text articles assessed for eligibility; 28 were included in the review. Studies showed great heterogeneity in experimental design, anatomical variables, and outcome measurements. The results indicate that rotary instruments, such as ProTaper Next<sup>®</sup> and XP-Endo Shaper<sup>®</sup>, were reported more frequently or showed favorable shaping trends in individual studies. Although rotary systems often appeared advantageous, conclusions were limited by study design variability and a lack of correlation with clinical outcomes. The evidence highlights the need for standardized methodologies and further research, especially on manual techniques. CBCT remains a valuable research tool despite inherent spatial resolution limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14020114
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CBCT in Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation—A Scoping Review

Maria Bartolomeu, Miguel Cardoso, Ana Moura Teles, Rita Noites et al.
Dentistry Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

CBCT in Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation—A Scoping Review

Maria Bartolomeu, Miguel Cardoso, Ana Moura Teles, Rita Noites, Andreia Vidal
article en

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely utilized in endodontics for evaluating root canal shaping outcomes, offering critical three-dimensional imaging capabilities. This study aims to assess the differences in apical and root canal preparation across various instrumentation techniques using CBCT. A systematic search of the Medline database (via PubMed) and Web of Science was performed up to 12 April 2025, yielding a total of 70 studies, with 45 full-text articles assessed for eligibility; 28 were included in the review. Studies showed great heterogeneity in experimental design, anatomical variables, and outcome measurements. The results indicate that rotary instruments, such as ProTaper Next<sup>®</sup> and XP-Endo Shaper<sup>®</sup>, were reported more frequently or showed favorable shaping trends in individual studies. Although rotary systems often appeared advantageous, conclusions were limited by study design variability and a lack of correlation with clinical outcomes. The evidence highlights the need for standardized methodologies and further research, especially on manual techniques. CBCT remains a valuable research tool despite inherent spatial resolution limitations.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(2)
Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.