An evaluation model of chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer based on combined serum CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1

Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies in women worldwide, and chemotherapy plays a crucial role in systemic treatment. However, accurate assessment of therapeutic efficacy remains a clinical challenge. Traditional radiographic evaluation is time-consuming and sometimes limited in reflecting biological response. Serum tumor markers, including carbohydrate antigen 15 − 3 (CA15-3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and cytokeratin fragment 21 − 1 (CYFRA 21 − 1), have been reported to correlate with tumor burden and treatment response. This study aimed to construct a retrospective evaluation model based on combined serum CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1 for predicting chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer patients. A total of 352 breast cancer patients who received standardized chemotherapy between January 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. Serum levels of CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1 were collected at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy. The associations between tumor marker dynamics and clinical response (complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease) were analyzed using logistic regression. A composite evaluation model (CCC model) was developed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to assess its discriminative performance compared with single markers. Among the 352 patients, 198 (56.3%) achieved an objective response (CR + PR), while 154 (43.7%) had non-response (SD + PD). Post-chemotherapy levels of CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1 were significantly lower in the response group compared with the non-response group (all P < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that decreases in CA15-3 (OR = 1.046, 95% CI: 1.018–1.075, P < 0.001), CEA (OR = 1.037, 95% CI: 1.012–1.064, P = 0.002), and CYFRA 21 − 1 (OR = 1.059, 95% CI: 1.022–1.097, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of chemotherapy efficacy. The CCC model integrating the three markers achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.921 (95% CI: 0.894–0.949), which was superior to single markers (CA15-3: 0.812, CEA: 0.773, CYFRA 21 − 1: 0.756). The combined serum tumor marker model (CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1) provides a robust, simple, and cost-effective method for retrospective evaluation of chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer patients. This CCC model can serve as a valuable adjunct to imaging modalities, enabling more precise treatment monitoring and potentially guiding timely therapeutic adjustments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15687-y
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation model of chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer based on combined serum CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1

Kun Wang, Yuehua Chen, Chun Dai, Shouchao Wang et al.
BMC Cancer
Lung Cancer Research Studies
article

An evaluation model of chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer based on combined serum CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1

Kun Wang, Yuehua Chen, Chun Dai, Shouchao Wang, Junya Zhang
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies in women worldwide, and chemotherapy plays a crucial role in systemic treatment. However, accurate assessment of therapeutic efficacy remains a clinical challenge. Traditional radiographic evaluation is time-consuming and sometimes limited in reflecting biological response. Serum tumor markers, including carbohydrate antigen 15 − 3 (CA15-3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and cytokeratin fragment 21 − 1 (CYFRA 21 − 1), have been reported to correlate with tumor burden and treatment response. This study aimed to construct a retrospective evaluation model based on combined serum CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1 for predicting chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer patients. A total of 352 breast cancer patients who received standardized chemotherapy between January 2020 and December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. Serum levels of CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1 were collected at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy. The associations between tumor marker dynamics and clinical response (complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease) were analyzed using logistic regression. A composite evaluation model (CCC model) was developed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to assess its discriminative performance compared with single markers. Among the 352 patients, 198 (56.3%) achieved an objective response (CR + PR), while 154 (43.7%) had non-response (SD + PD). Post-chemotherapy levels of CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1 were significantly lower in the response group compared with the non-response group (all P < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that decreases in CA15-3 (OR = 1.046, 95% CI: 1.018–1.075, P < 0.001), CEA (OR = 1.037, 95% CI: 1.012–1.064, P = 0.002), and CYFRA 21 − 1 (OR = 1.059, 95% CI: 1.022–1.097, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of chemotherapy efficacy. The CCC model integrating the three markers achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.921 (95% CI: 0.894–0.949), which was superior to single markers (CA15-3: 0.812, CEA: 0.773, CYFRA 21 − 1: 0.756). The combined serum tumor marker model (CA15-3, CEA, and CYFRA 21 − 1) provides a robust, simple, and cost-effective method for retrospective evaluation of chemotherapy efficacy in breast cancer patients. This CCC model can serve as a valuable adjunct to imaging modalities, enabling more precise treatment monitoring and potentially guiding timely therapeutic adjustments.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
Jiangsu University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University (CN), People's Hospital of Yangzhong (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Lung Cancer Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.