The incompatibility of the Condorcet winner and loser criteria with positive involvement and resolvability

We prove that there is no preferential voting method satisfying the Condorcet winner and loser criteria, positive involvement (if a candidate x wins in an initial preference profile, then adding a voter who ranks x uniquely first cannot cause x to lose), and n -voter resolvability (if x initially ties for winning, then x can be made the unique winner by adding some set of up to n voters). This impossibility theorem holds for any positive integer n . It also holds if either the Condorcet loser criterion is replaced by independence of clones or positive involvement is replaced by negative involvement. • Condorcet winner and loser, positive involvement, and resolvability are jointly incompatible. • Condorcet loser can be replaced by independence of clones. • Positive involvement can be replaced by negative involvement. • Resolvability can be weakened to n-voter resolvability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2026.112868
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The incompatibility of the Condorcet winner and loser criteria with positive involvement and resolvability

Wesley H. Holliday
Economics Letters
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

The incompatibility of the Condorcet winner and loser criteria with positive involvement and resolvability

Wesley H. Holliday
article en

Abstract

We prove that there is no preferential voting method satisfying the Condorcet winner and loser criteria, positive involvement (if a candidate x wins in an initial preference profile, then adding a voter who ranks x uniquely first cannot cause x to lose), and n -voter resolvability (if x initially ties for winning, then x can be made the unique winner by adding some set of up to n voters). This impossibility theorem holds for any positive integer n . It also holds if either the Condorcet loser criterion is replaced by independence of clones or positive involvement is replaced by negative involvement. • Condorcet winner and loser, positive involvement, and resolvability are jointly incompatible. • Condorcet loser can be replaced by independence of clones. • Positive involvement can be replaced by negative involvement. • Resolvability can be weakened to n-voter resolvability.

Economics LettersVol. 262
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The incompatibility of the Condorcet winner and loser criteria with positive involvement and resolvability — Wesley H. Holliday · Economics Letters (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS