Effects of dry and wet grinding on Chalcopyrite surface reactivity, liberation, and flotation performance

Grinding environment strongly influences chalcopyrite surface reactivity and flotation, but direct dry-wet comparisons are often confounded by size and liberation effects. This study presents a mechanistically controlled comparison of dry and wet grinding effects on chalcopyrite by achieving closely matched particle size distributions and comparable liberation for both a model mineral and a low-grade copper ore. Under these controlled conditions, pronounced differences in surface chemistry and electrochemical reactivity were observed. Dry-ground particles exhibited higher oxygen demand, indicating highly reactive, minimally passivated surfaces, whereas wet-ground particles showed greater surface oxidation, which intensified with increasing temperature due to galvanic interactions and oxyhydroxide formation. These surface modifications directly translated into flotation behaviour: dry grinding consistently yielded higher copper recoveries and grades, while wet grinding particularly at elevated temperatures led to reduced collector adsorption and flotation performance. Grinding additives had negligible effects on the model mineral and only modestly improved recovery in the real ore, without altering dominant oxidation trends. Overall, the results demonstrate that, under equivalent liberation conditions, chalcopyrite flotation performance is governed primarily by grinding-induced surface chemistry rather than bulk mineral exposure. • Bulk surface chalcopyrite liberation is similar under both grinding environment. • Dry grinding forms reactive surfaces; wet grinding reduces reactivity at all T, GA negligible. • Flotation efficiency is governed by surface chemistry under comparable liberation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Powder Technology
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2026.122288
Primary Topic
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of dry and wet grinding on Chalcopyrite surface reactivity, liberation, and flotation performance

William M. Skinner, George Blankson Abaka-Wood, Richmond Komla Asamoah, Christopher Greet et al.
Powder Technology
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
article

Effects of dry and wet grinding on Chalcopyrite surface reactivity, liberation, and flotation performance

William M. Skinner, George Blankson Abaka-Wood, Richmond Komla Asamoah, Christopher Greet, Theophilus Amos-Judge, M. Zainin
article en

Abstract

Grinding environment strongly influences chalcopyrite surface reactivity and flotation, but direct dry-wet comparisons are often confounded by size and liberation effects. This study presents a mechanistically controlled comparison of dry and wet grinding effects on chalcopyrite by achieving closely matched particle size distributions and comparable liberation for both a model mineral and a low-grade copper ore. Under these controlled conditions, pronounced differences in surface chemistry and electrochemical reactivity were observed. Dry-ground particles exhibited higher oxygen demand, indicating highly reactive, minimally passivated surfaces, whereas wet-ground particles showed greater surface oxidation, which intensified with increasing temperature due to galvanic interactions and oxyhydroxide formation. These surface modifications directly translated into flotation behaviour: dry grinding consistently yielded higher copper recoveries and grades, while wet grinding particularly at elevated temperatures led to reduced collector adsorption and flotation performance. Grinding additives had negligible effects on the model mineral and only modestly improved recovery in the real ore, without altering dominant oxidation trends. Overall, the results demonstrate that, under equivalent liberation conditions, chalcopyrite flotation performance is governed primarily by grinding-induced surface chemistry rather than bulk mineral exposure. • Bulk surface chalcopyrite liberation is similar under both grinding environment. • Dry grinding forms reactive surfaces; wet grinding reduces reactivity at all T, GA negligible. • Flotation efficiency is governed by surface chemistry under comparable liberation.

Powder TechnologyVol. 474
University of South Australia (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Enabling Eco-Efficient Beneficiation of Minerals (AU), Mineral Resources (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.