Community-based interventions for cognitive health in older adults: a scoping review

The global prevalence of dementia was projected to almost triple from 2019 to 2050, imposing major health, social, and economic burdens. With limited pharmacological options, interventions targeting modifiable risk factors in community settings may help delay or reduce cognitive decline. Evidence of their effectiveness and feasibility for large-scale implementation, however, remains fragmented. This scoping review synthesised evidence on community-based interventions for promoting cognitive health in older adults, examining intervention domains, cognitive outcomes, and implementation barriers and strategies. The review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework. Five databases and supplementary sources were searched for studies published between 2014 and 2025. Eligible studies examined single- or multi-domain community-based interventions targeting older adults (≥ 60 years) without dementia at baseline. Data extraction captured intervention characteristics, cognitive outcomes, and implementation-related findings. Barriers were mapped using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), and implementation strategies were classified according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy. Eighty-two studies were included. Interventions addressed single domains (n = 43; mainly physical activity or cognitive training) or multiple domains (n = 39; commonly combining physical activity and cognitive components, with additions such as nutrition, vascular risk management, or social engagement). Cognitive outcomes varied, with some studies demonstrating significant improvements and others showing mixed or null effects. Reported implementation barriers included intervention complexity, participant burden, limited organisational capacity, and contextual challenges related to accessibility and community awareness. Twenty-seven unique strategies were identified across pre-, during-, and post-implementation phases. Community-based interventions hold promise for promoting cognitive health in older adults, yet evidence of consistent effectiveness remains limited, and implementation processes are often underreported. Strengthening the integration of implementation science within future studies—while addressing contextual and system-level barriers—may enhance scalability, sustainability, and equitable reach of such programmes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07148-9
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-based interventions for cognitive health in older adults: a scoping review

Milawaty Nurjono, Angela Frances Yap, Lian Leng Low, Yichi Zhang et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Community-based interventions for cognitive health in older adults: a scoping review

Milawaty Nurjono, Angela Frances Yap, Lian Leng Low, Yichi Zhang, Yuanyuan Cao, Yasmin Lynda Munro, Yu Heng Kwan
article en

Abstract

The global prevalence of dementia was projected to almost triple from 2019 to 2050, imposing major health, social, and economic burdens. With limited pharmacological options, interventions targeting modifiable risk factors in community settings may help delay or reduce cognitive decline. Evidence of their effectiveness and feasibility for large-scale implementation, however, remains fragmented. This scoping review synthesised evidence on community-based interventions for promoting cognitive health in older adults, examining intervention domains, cognitive outcomes, and implementation barriers and strategies. The review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework. Five databases and supplementary sources were searched for studies published between 2014 and 2025. Eligible studies examined single- or multi-domain community-based interventions targeting older adults (≥ 60 years) without dementia at baseline. Data extraction captured intervention characteristics, cognitive outcomes, and implementation-related findings. Barriers were mapped using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), and implementation strategies were classified according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy. Eighty-two studies were included. Interventions addressed single domains (n = 43; mainly physical activity or cognitive training) or multiple domains (n = 39; commonly combining physical activity and cognitive components, with additions such as nutrition, vascular risk management, or social engagement). Cognitive outcomes varied, with some studies demonstrating significant improvements and others showing mixed or null effects. Reported implementation barriers included intervention complexity, participant burden, limited organisational capacity, and contextual challenges related to accessibility and community awareness. Twenty-seven unique strategies were identified across pre-, during-, and post-implementation phases. Community-based interventions hold promise for promoting cognitive health in older adults, yet evidence of consistent effectiveness remains limited, and implementation processes are often underreported. Strengthening the integration of implementation science within future studies—while addressing contextual and system-level barriers—may enhance scalability, sustainability, and equitable reach of such programmes.

BMC GeriatricsVol. 26(1)
SingHealth (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Singapore General Hospital (SG), Changi General Hospital (SG), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.