Crime prevention effects of data retention policies

Abstract Adding to the extensive political and legal debates on data retention, this is the first empirical study to analyze the impacts of data retention on crime prevention in Europe. Using an estimator that captures dynamic effects and is robust to heterogeneous treatment effects, we find a significant negative effect on aggregate crime rates. However, our findings indicate that a minimum of one year is required following the implementation of the obligations for a decrease in crime rates to occur, indicating a gradual adjustment in delinquent behavior. Moreover, distinct effects occur not only after the introduction of data retention laws but also when these laws are canceled. In addition, we present evidence that the effects on aggregate crime rates are likely driven by changes in property crime rates and fraud, whereas violent crime rates remain unaffected (JEL K42, K14, C21, C23, H76).

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Law Economics and Organization
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewag009
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crime prevention effects of data retention policies

The Journal of Law Economics and Organization
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Crime prevention effects of data retention policies

article en

Abstract

Abstract Adding to the extensive political and legal debates on data retention, this is the first empirical study to analyze the impacts of data retention on crime prevention in Europe. Using an estimator that captures dynamic effects and is robust to heterogeneous treatment effects, we find a significant negative effect on aggregate crime rates. However, our findings indicate that a minimum of one year is required following the implementation of the obligations for a decrease in crime rates to occur, indicating a gradual adjustment in delinquent behavior. Moreover, distinct effects occur not only after the introduction of data retention laws but also when these laws are canceled. In addition, we present evidence that the effects on aggregate crime rates are likely driven by changes in property crime rates and fraud, whereas violent crime rates remain unaffected (JEL K42, K14, C21, C23, H76).

The Journal of Law Economics and Organization
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.