2026 ADEA Annual Session and Exhibition: Poster Abstracts

Objectives : Patient-specific simulation models are emerging as valuable tools for surgical training.The aim of this study was to describe a novel workflow for the fabrication of patientspecif ic 3D-printed jaw models and to assess their applicability for simulation-based training in oral surgery.Methods : A novel workflow was developed to fabricate patientspecific maxillary models derived from patients' CBCT and intraoral scans.Models' face and content validity were evaluated by 18 periodontists and 50 dental students using a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale (VAS).To assess the impact of simulation training on surgical performance, periodontics residents performed guided bone regeneration procedures either with or without prior simulation surgeries.Each resident completed three independent surgeries in the following order: Surgery 1: without simulation, Surgery 2: with simulation, and Surgery 3: without simulation.Surgical performance was video-recorded and then evaluated by two expert evaluators using de-identified recordings and an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) checklist.Preoperative anxiety was measured using the anxiety (STAI-S) questionnaire.Results : The fabricated model demonstrated high accuracy in replicating the patient's soft and hard tissue anatomy.The mean overall VAS rating score of the model was significantly higher for students than periodontists (83.7 9.7 vs. 72.1 15.8; p < 0.05).The OSATS global rating score results showed a slight upward shift in score distribution from Surgery 1 to Surgery 2, with more consistent performance among residents in Surgery 3.However, these differences were not statistically significant.A trend toward reduced mean anxiety scores was noted in Surgery 2, although this difference also did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions : The proposed 3D-printed simulation workflow yielded accurate and educationally valuable models with the potential to enhance surgical education.Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings and support their integration into educational curricula.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dental Education
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70149
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2026 ADEA Annual Session and Exhibition: Poster Abstracts

Journal of Dental Education
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
article

2026 ADEA Annual Session and Exhibition: Poster Abstracts

article en

Abstract

Objectives : Patient-specific simulation models are emerging as valuable tools for surgical training.The aim of this study was to describe a novel workflow for the fabrication of patientspecif ic 3D-printed jaw models and to assess their applicability for simulation-based training in oral surgery.Methods : A novel workflow was developed to fabricate patientspecific maxillary models derived from patients' CBCT and intraoral scans.Models' face and content validity were evaluated by 18 periodontists and 50 dental students using a questionnaire with a visual analogue scale (VAS).To assess the impact of simulation training on surgical performance, periodontics residents performed guided bone regeneration procedures either with or without prior simulation surgeries.Each resident completed three independent surgeries in the following order: Surgery 1: without simulation, Surgery 2: with simulation, and Surgery 3: without simulation.Surgical performance was video-recorded and then evaluated by two expert evaluators using de-identified recordings and an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) checklist.Preoperative anxiety was measured using the anxiety (STAI-S) questionnaire.Results : The fabricated model demonstrated high accuracy in replicating the patient's soft and hard tissue anatomy.The mean overall VAS rating score of the model was significantly higher for students than periodontists (83.7 9.7 vs. 72.1 15.8; p < 0.05).The OSATS global rating score results showed a slight upward shift in score distribution from Surgery 1 to Surgery 2, with more consistent performance among residents in Surgery 3.However, these differences were not statistically significant.A trend toward reduced mean anxiety scores was noted in Surgery 2, although this difference also did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions : The proposed 3D-printed simulation workflow yielded accurate and educationally valuable models with the potential to enhance surgical education.Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings and support their integration into educational curricula.

Journal of Dental EducationVol. 90(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

2026 ADEA Annual Session and Exhibition: Poster Abstracts · Journal of Dental Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS