‘Mirin’ and beyond − gender identity, domestic private international law, and human rights in the EU

Abstract This article deals with gender identity and private international law, particularly in cross-border situations within the European Union (EU). It examines how different legal systems handle legal gender determination and change, including binary and non-binary approaches, as well as the conflicts that arise when individuals wish to have their status recognized in another country. A central point is the analysis of the impact of the CJEU’s ‘Mirin’ ruling, which strengthens the right to free movement and recognition of gender identity in EU Member States. The text argues that recognition of a gender status legally acquired abroad is essential for reasons of continuity of status and the protection of personal rights. Recognition/Acceptance can, therefore, only be refused under exceptional circumstances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law Policy and the Family
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebaf036
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Mirin’ and beyond − gender identity, domestic private international law, and human rights in the EU

Susanne Lilian Gössl
International Journal of Law Policy and the Family
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

‘Mirin’ and beyond − gender identity, domestic private international law, and human rights in the EU

Susanne Lilian Gössl
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article deals with gender identity and private international law, particularly in cross-border situations within the European Union (EU). It examines how different legal systems handle legal gender determination and change, including binary and non-binary approaches, as well as the conflicts that arise when individuals wish to have their status recognized in another country. A central point is the analysis of the impact of the CJEU’s ‘Mirin’ ruling, which strengthens the right to free movement and recognition of gender identity in EU Member States. The text argues that recognition of a gender status legally acquired abroad is essential for reasons of continuity of status and the protection of personal rights. Recognition/Acceptance can, therefore, only be refused under exceptional circumstances.

International Journal of Law Policy and the FamilyVol. 40(1)
British Institute of International and Comparative Law (GB), Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Mirin’ and beyond − gender identity, domestic private international law, and human rights in the EU — Susanne Lilian Gössl · International Journal of Law Policy and the Family (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS