Accuracy of Voluntary Force Modulation During the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull

The purpose of this study was to investigate voluntary force modulation accuracy during the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) and to investigate biological sex and relative strength as factors relating to error. Strength-trained males (n = 18) and females (n = 18) completed ascending (ASC) (25%, 50%, 75%) or descending (DESC) (75%, 50%, 25%) submaximal testing followed by maximal testing. Subjects rested before completing the opposite submaximal testing sequence. External feedback was not provided during testing. Measured and intended (INT) forces were analyzed with two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs with within- (ASC, DESC, and INT) and between-subject factors (male or female). Independent-samples <i>t</i>-tests analyzed differences in error between males and females. Pearson correlations were calculated to investigate associations between relative strength and error. Statistically significant differences were observed between INT and measured force at every intensity (<i>p</i> < 0.05); however, differences in error were not significant between males and females (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Statistically non-significant small relationships were observed between relative strength and error (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Subjects demonstrate error in force modulation during the IMTP, with the greatest error occurring at lower relative intensity. However, these results indicate that biological sex and relative strength may not influence force modulation accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14020083
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of Voluntary Force Modulation During the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull

Christopher B. Taber, Stephanie Balint, Olivia Vadas, S. Alexander Long et al.
Sports
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Accuracy of Voluntary Force Modulation During the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull

Christopher B. Taber, Stephanie Balint, Olivia Vadas, S. Alexander Long, Michael H. Stone
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate voluntary force modulation accuracy during the isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) and to investigate biological sex and relative strength as factors relating to error. Strength-trained males (n = 18) and females (n = 18) completed ascending (ASC) (25%, 50%, 75%) or descending (DESC) (75%, 50%, 25%) submaximal testing followed by maximal testing. Subjects rested before completing the opposite submaximal testing sequence. External feedback was not provided during testing. Measured and intended (INT) forces were analyzed with two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs with within- (ASC, DESC, and INT) and between-subject factors (male or female). Independent-samples <i>t</i>-tests analyzed differences in error between males and females. Pearson correlations were calculated to investigate associations between relative strength and error. Statistically significant differences were observed between INT and measured force at every intensity (<i>p</i> < 0.05); however, differences in error were not significant between males and females (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Statistically non-significant small relationships were observed between relative strength and error (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Subjects demonstrate error in force modulation during the IMTP, with the greatest error occurring at lower relative intensity. However, these results indicate that biological sex and relative strength may not influence force modulation accuracy.

SportsVol. 14(2)
East Tennessee State University (US), Sacred Heart University (US), Quinnipiac University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.